Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802785›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Mechanisms of collective learning: how can animal groups improve collective performance when repeating a task?

Julien Collet, Joe Morford, Patrick Lewin, Anne-Sophie Bonnet-Lebrun, Takao Sasaki, Dora Biro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An associative account of collective learning.Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A multi-scale review of the dynamics of collective behaviour: from rapid responses to ontogeny and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julien ColletDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3285-5535
Joe MorfordDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3687-1783
Patrick LewinDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-7264
Anne-Sophie Bonnet-LebrunCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS - La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France.
Takao SasakiOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-9855
Dora BiroDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-6274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning is ubiquitous in animals: individuals can use their experience to fine-tune behaviour and thus to better adapt to the environment during their lifetime. Observations have accumulated that, at the collective level, groups can also use their experience to improve collective performance. Yet, despite apparent simplicity, the links between individual learning capacities and a collective's performance can be extremely complex. Here we propose a centralized and broadly applicable framework to begin classifying this complexity. Focusing principally on groups with stable composition, we first identify three distinct ways through which groups can improve their collective performance when repeating a task: each member learning to better solve the task on its own, members learning about each other to better respond to one another and members learning to improve their complementarity. We show through selected empirical examples, simulations and theoretical treatments that these three categories identify distinct mechanisms with distinct consequences and predictions. These mechanisms extend well beyond current social learning and collective decision-making theories in explaining collective learning. Finally, our approach, definitions and categories help generate new empirical and theoretical research avenues, including charting the expected distribution of collective learning capacities across taxa and its links to social stability and evolution. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Collective behaviour through time'.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsDecision MakingLearningcollective decision-makingcollective learningevolutionarily stable strategiesindividual learningsocial learningsocial stability

Identifiers

PMID36802785
PMCPMC9939276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.