Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802410›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Durvalumab plus Cetuximab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Open-label, Nonrandomized, Phase II Clinical Trial.

Shuchi Gulati, McKenzie Crist, Muhammed Kashif Riaz, Vinita Takiar, Maria Lehn, Ilaina Monroe, Sarah Palackdharry, Nicky Kurtzweil, Roman Jandarov, Nusrat Harun and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EGFR: New Insights on Its Activation and Mutation in Tumor and Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Systemic therapy for laryngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shuchi GulatiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-6793-9694
McKenzie CristDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-0322
Muhammed Kashif RiazDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-7862
Vinita TakiarDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-3516
Maria LehnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-7733
Ilaina MonroeUniversity of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-7042
Sarah PalackdharryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-6394-8080
Nicky KurtzweilUniversity of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-4797-2571
Roman JandarovDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-2145-045X
Nusrat HarunDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-3413
Trisha M Wise-DraperDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-4028
University of Cincinnati · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USCincinnati Health Department · USCincinnati VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

KL2 Training ProgramKL2TR001426 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZELLER, MARGARET H · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
Training Program in Cancer TherapeuticsT32CA117846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PRICE, CAROLYN M, TAKIAR, VINITA · 2006 to 2022
$6.5M
Combination of Transcriptomic and Metallomic Biomarkers for Risk Assessment in Locoregional Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaK08CA273542 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Shuchi Gulati · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
Translational Research Career Development: Overcoming Resistance to RadiotherapyIK2BX004360 · VA · CINCINNATI VA MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH · PI Vinita Takiar · 2019 to 2026
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX004360NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001426NCI NIH HHS K08 CA273542NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of cetuximab is poor in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cetuximab initiates natural killer (NK) cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, with resultant recruitment of immune cells and suppression of antitumor immunity. We hypothesized that adding an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) could overcome this and lead to an enhanced antitumor response. PATIENTS AND

methodsA phase II study of cetuximab and durvalumab in metastatic HNSCC was conducted. Eligible patients had measurable disease. Patients who had received both cetuximab and an ICI were excluded. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 at 6 months.

resultsAs of April 2022, 35 patients enrolled, of whom 33 received at least 1 dose of durvalumab and were included in the response analysis. Eleven patients (33%) had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, 10 an ICI (30%), and 1 patient (3%) cetuximab. ORR was 39% (13/33) with a median duration of response of 8.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.5-16.8]. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.7-14.1) and 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.8-16.3), respectively. There were 16 grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) and one grade 4 TRAE, with no treatment-related deaths. Overall and progression-free survival did not correlate with PD-L1 status. NK cell cytotoxic activity was increased by cetuximab and further increased with the addition of durvalumab in responders.

conclusionsThe combination of cetuximab and durvalumab demonstrated durable activity with a tolerable safety profile in metastatic HNSCC and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, MonoclonalCetuximabdurvalumab

Identifiers

PMID36802410
PMCPMC10192200
OpenAlexW4321441516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.