Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802360›Full record

ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. A2023

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics.

Dylan M Anstine, Olexandr Isayev

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DSKO: Dancing through DFTB Parametrization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Accelerating Catalyst Materials Discovery With Large Artificial Intelligence Models.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculations in Protein Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dylan M AnstineDepartment of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Olexandr IsayevDepartment of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7581-8497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs), such as those using neural networks, have resulted in short-range models that can infer interaction energies with near ab initio accuracy and orders of magnitude reduced computational cost. For many atom systems, including macromolecules, biomolecules, and condensed matter, model accuracy can become reliant on the description of short- and long-range physical interactions. The latter terms can be difficult to incorporate into an MLIP framework. Recent research has produced numerous models with considerations for nonlocal electrostatic and dispersion interactions, leading to a large range of applications that can be addressed using MLIPs. In light of this, we present a Perspective focused on key methodologies and models being used where the presence of nonlocal physics and chemistry are crucial for describing system properties. The strategies covered include MLIPs augmented with dispersion corrections, electrostatics calculated with charges predicted from atomic environment descriptors, the use of self-consistency and message passing iterations to propagated nonlocal system information, and charges obtained via equilibration schemes. We aim to provide a pointed discussion to support the development of machine learning-based interatomic potentials for systems where contributions from only nearsighted terms are deficient.

Identifiers

PMID36802360
PMCPMC10041642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.