Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802355›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2023

Age of Diagnosis Does Not Alter the Presentation or Progression of Robustly Defined Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes.

Nicholas J Thomas, Anita V Hill, Colin M Dayan, Richard A Oram, Timothy J McDonald, Beverley M Shields, Angus G Jones, StartRight Study Group

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03737799 unknown statusnot on this map

StartRight: Getting the Right Classification and Treatment From Diagnosis in Adults With Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustRan2016 to 2024Enrolled1,815ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus
NCT06006468 completednot on this map

Evaluating ImmuNe Changes in the Evolution of Pre Type 1 Diabetes With Adult Onset

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustRan2023 to 2023Enrolled2,250ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Maturity OnsetArmsHigh genetic risk for type 1 diabetes, High gentic risk for Coeliac disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J ThomasUniversity of Exeter College of Medicine & Health, Exeter, U.K.
Anita V HillRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, U.K.
Colin M DayanCardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6557-3462
Richard A OramUniversity of Exeter College of Medicine & Health, Exeter, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-8980
Timothy J McDonaldUniversity of Exeter College of Medicine & Health, Exeter, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3559-6660
Beverley M ShieldsUniversity of Exeter College of Medicine & Health, Exeter, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3785-327X
Angus G JonesUniversity of Exeter College of Medicine & Health, Exeter, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-7599
StartRight Study Group
University of Exeter · GBCardiff University · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2015-15-018Diabetes UK 17/0005624Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether presentation, progression, and genetic susceptibility of robustly defined adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) are altered by diagnosis age. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe compared the relationship between diagnosis age and presentation, C-peptide loss (annual change in urine C-peptide-creatinine ratio [UCPCR]), and genetic susceptibility (T1D genetic risk score [GRS]) in adults with confirmed T1D in the prospective StartRight study, 1,798 adults with new-onset diabetes. T1D was defined in two ways: two or more positive islet autoantibodies (of GAD antibody, IA-2 antigen, and ZnT8 autoantibody) irrespective of clinical diagnosis (n = 385) or one positive islet autoantibody and a clinical diagnosis of T1D (n = 180).

resultsIn continuous analysis, age of diagnosis was not associated with C-peptide loss for either definition of T1D (P > 0.1), with mean (95% CI) annual C-peptide loss in those diagnosed before and after 35 years of age (median age of T1D defined by two or more positive autoantibodies): 39% (31-46) vs. 44% (38-50) with two or more positive islet autoantibodies and 43% (33-51) vs. 39% (31-46) with clinician diagnosis confirmed by one positive islet autoantibody (P > 0.1). Baseline C-peptide and T1D GRS were unaffected by age of diagnosis or T1D definition (P > 0.1). In T1D defined by two or more autoantibodies, presentation severity was similar in those diagnosed before and after 35 years of age: unintentional weight loss, 80% (95% CI 74-85) vs. 82% (76-87); ketoacidosis, 24% (18-30) vs. 19% (14-25); and presentation glucose, 21 mmol/L (19-22) vs. 21 mmol/L (20-22) (all P ≥ 0.1). Despite similar presentation, older adults were less likely to be diagnosed with T1D, insulin-treated, or admitted to hospital.

conclusionsWhen adult-onset T1D is robustly defined, the presentation characteristics, progression, and T1D genetic susceptibility are not altered by age of diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AgedAutoantibodiesC-PeptideGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansProspective StudiesAutoantibodiesC-Peptide

Identifiers

PMID36802355
PMCPMC7614569
OpenAlexW4321443718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.