Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802317›Full record

SynthesisCurrent urology reports2023

Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.

Megha Garg, Hans Johnson, Su-Min Lee, Bhavan Prasad Rai, Bhaskar Somani, Joe Philip

Full text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current urology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hyperoxaluria: Diagnosis and Treatment.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megha GargBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, West bury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-1936
Hans JohnsonBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, West bury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-4544
Su-Min LeeBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, West bury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-7826
Bhavan Prasad RaiFreeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-7246
Bhaskar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Joe PhilipBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, West bury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. indianajoe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1330-8883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success rates depend on several stone and patient-related factors, one of which is stone density which is calculated on computed tomography scan in Hounsfield Units. Studies have shown inverse correlation between SWL success and HU; however, there remains considerable variation between studies. We performed a systematic review regarding the use of HU in SWL for renal calculi to consolidate the current evidence and address current knowledge gaps. RECENT

findingsDatabase including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception through August 2022. Studies in English language analysing stone density/attenuation in adult patients undergoing SWL for renal calculi were included for assessment of Shockwave lithotripsy outcomes, use of stone attenuation to predict success, use of mean and peak stone density and Hounsfield unit density, determination of optimum cut-off values, nomograms/scoring systems, and assessment of stone heterogeneity. 28 studies with a total of 4,206 patients were included in this systematic review with sample size ranging from 30 to 385 patients. Male to female ratio was 1.8, with an average age of 46.3 years. Mean overall ESWL success was 66.5%. Stone size ranged from 4 to 30 mm in diameter. Mean stone density was used by two-third of the studies to predict the appropriate cut-off for SWL success, ranging from 750 to 1000 HU. Additional factors such as peak HU and stone heterogeneity index were also evaluated with variable results. Stone heterogeneity index was considered a better indicator for success in larger stones (cut-off value of 213) and predicting SWL stone clearance in one session. Prediction scores had been attempted, with researchers looking into combining stone density with other factors such as skin to stone distance, stone volume, and differing heterogeneity indices with variable results. Numerous studies demonstrate a link between shockwave lithotripsy outcomes and stone density. Hounsfield unit < 750 has been found to be associated with shockwave lithotripsy success, with likelihood of failure strongly associated with values over 1000. Prospective standardisation of Hounsfield unit measurement and predictive algorithm for shockwave lithotripsy outcome should be considered to strengthen future evidence and help clinicians in the decision making.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database: CRD42020224647.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLithotripsyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeExtracorporeal shockwave therapyHounsfield unitKidney calculiNephrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID36802317
PMCPMC10038959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read61
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.