Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802244›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2023

Prognosis after hepatic resection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma related to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: meta-analysis.

Jia-Yong Su, Zhu-Jian Deng, Yu-Xian Teng, Ye Xin Koh, Wan-Guang Zhang, Ming-Hua Zheng, Si Xie, Rong-Rui Huo, Chao-Jing Chen, Liang Ma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia-Yong SuHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Zhu-Jian DengHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Yu-Xian TengHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Ye Xin KohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Wan-Guang ZhangHepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ming-Hua ZhengNAFLD Research Center, Department of Hepatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Si XieHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Rong-Rui HuoHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Chao-Jing ChenHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Liang MaHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Jian-Hong ZhongHepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1494-6396
Guangxi Medical University · CNSingapore General Hospital · SGTongji Hospital · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Guangxi Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship X202210598347Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education YCSW2022226National Natural Science Foundation of China 82060510Specific Research Project of Guangxi for Research Bases and Talents
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection differ between patients whose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is related to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or has other aetiologies is unknown. A systematic review was performed to explore potential differences between such conditions.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and recurrence-free survival between patients with NAFLD-related HCC or HCC of other aetiologies.

resultsThe meta-analysis involved 17 retrospective studies involving 2470 patients (21.5 per cent) with NAFLD-related HCC and 9007 (78.5 per cent) with HCC of other aetiologies. Patients with NAFLD-related HCC were older and had higher body mass index (BMI), but were less likely to have cirrhosis (50.4 per cent versus 64.0 per cent, P < 0.001). The two groups suffered similar rates of perioperative complications and mortality. Patients with NAFLD-related HCC had slightly higher overall survival (HR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 1.02) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.93, 95 per cent c.i. 0.84 to 1.02) than those with HCC of other aetiologies. In the various subgroup analyses, the only significant finding was that Asian patients with NAFLD-related HCC had significantly better overall survival (HR 0.82, 95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.95) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.88, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 0.98) than Asian patients with HCC of other aetiologies.

conclusionThe available evidence suggests that patients with NAFLD-related HCC have similar perioperative complications and mortality, but potentially longer overall and recurrence-free survival, compared with those with HCC of other aetiologies. Tailored surveillance strategies should be developed for patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHumansLiver CirrhosisPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36802244
PMCPMC9939291
OpenAlexW4321349301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.