Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802199›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2023

Advances in Gelatin Bioinks to Optimize Bioprinted Cell Functions.

Saad Asim, Tanveer A Tabish, Usman Liaqat, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Muhammad Rizwan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Saad AsimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Tanveer A TabishCardiovascular Division, Radcliff Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Usman LiaqatDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Ibrahim T OzbolatEngineering Science and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-0036
Michigan Technological University · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNational University of Sciences and Technology · PKPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Technology Development Project - Increasing the complexity of ex vivo human airway models for studying immune response to viral infectionU19AI142733 · NIAID · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Julia Oh · 2019 to 2026
$23.1M
Intraoperative bioprinting of composite tissues with zonal stratification for craniomaxillofacial reconstructionR01DE028614 · NIDCR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI OZBOLAT, IBRAHIM · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI142733NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin is a widely utilized bioprinting biomaterial due to its cell-adhesive and enzymatically cleavable properties, which improve cell adhesion and growth. Gelatin is often covalently cross-linked to stabilize bioprinted structures, yet the covalently cross-linked matrix is unable to recapitulate the dynamic microenvironment of the natural extracellular matrix (ECM), thereby limiting the functions of bioprinted cells. To some extent, a double network bioink can provide a more ECM-mimetic, bioprinted niche for cell growth. More recently, gelatin matrices are being designed using reversible cross-linking methods that can emulate the dynamic mechanical properties of the ECM. This review analyzes the progress in developing gelatin bioink formulations for 3D cell culture, and critically analyzes the bioprinting and cross-linking techniques, with a focus on strategies to optimize the functions of bioprinted cells. This review discusses new cross-linking chemistries that recapitulate the viscoelastic, stress-relaxing microenvironment of the ECM, and enable advanced cell functions, yet are less explored in engineering the gelatin bioink. Finally, this work presents the perspective on the areas of future research and argues that the next generation of gelatin bioinks should be designed by considering cell-matrix interactions, and bioprinted constructs should be validated against currently established 3D cell culture standards to achieve improved therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

BioprintingTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinHydrogels3D bioprintingcovalent cross-linkingextracellular matrixgelatin bioinksstress relaxationviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID36802199
PMCPMC10330013
OpenAlexW4321352475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.