Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802198›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2023

The impact of COVID-19 on the assessment and management of ectopic pregnancies.

Bethany Chung, Charlotte Greene, Alice Pearson, Lisa M Starrs, W Colin Duncan

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bethany ChungRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-5165
Charlotte GreeneRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health.
Alice PearsonRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health.
Lisa M StarrsRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health.
W Colin DuncanRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health.ORCID 0000-0002-7170-5740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lay Summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the public delayed seeking medical help, which may have affected the impact of having an ectopic pregnancy. An ectopic pregnancy is when pregnancy tissue grows outside its normal position in the womb, and it can be life-threatening. It can be treated by non-surgical or surgical options, and any delay in seeking help can reduce the options for treatment and increase the need for more urgent management. We wanted to assess whether there were differences in the presentation and management of ectopic pregnancies in a major teaching hospital between 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2021 (COVID-19 period). We found that the pandemic did not cause a delay in seeking medical help or cause worse outcomes. In fact, immediate surgical treatment and time in the hospital were less during COVID-19, perhaps because of a desire to avoid admission to hospital. One outcome of COVID-19 is reassurance that we can safely use more non-surgical treatments for ectopic pregnancies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy, EctopicAnimalsFemalePandemicsPregnancyUterusCOVID-19ectopicpregnancywomen's health

Identifiers

PMID36802198
PMCPMC10083650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.