Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802029›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Efficacy of progressive versus severe energy restriction on body composition and strength in concurrent trained women.

Salvador Vargas-Molina, Diego A Bonilla, Jorge L Petro, Leandro Carbone, Manuel García-Sillero, José Manuel Jurado-Castro, Brad J Schoenfeld, Javier Benítez-Porres

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Salvador Vargas-MolinaPhysical Education and Sports Area, Faculty of Medicine, University of Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 25, 29010, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-9159
Diego A BonillaResearch Division, Dynamical Business and Science Society-DBSS International SAS, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-1220
Jorge L PetroResearch Division, Dynamical Business and Science Society-DBSS International SAS, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-1000
Leandro CarboneUniversity of Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-1434
Manuel García-SilleroEADE-University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3022-9151
José Manuel Jurado-CastroMetabolism and Investigation Unit, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-2793
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Health Sciences, CUNY Lehman College, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4979-5783
Javier Benítez-PorresPhysical Education and Sports Area, Faculty of Medicine, University of Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 25, 29010, Málaga, Spain. benitez@uma.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-7965
Universidad de Málaga · ESLehman College · USSpanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition · ESUniversidad del Salvador · ARUniversity of Córdoba · COUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the concurrent training (CT) effect in combination with either progressive energy restriction (PER) or severe energy restriction (SER) on body composition and strength-related variables in resistance-trained women.

methodsFourteen women (29.5 ± 3.8 years; 23.8 ± 2.8 kg·m

resultsSignificant reductions in FM were observed in PER and SER (Δ = - 1.7 ± 0.4 kg; P =  < 0.001; ES = - 0.39 and Δ = - 1.2 ± 0.6 kg; P = 0.002; ES = - 0.20, respectively). After correcting FFM for fat-free adipose tissue (FFAT), no significant differences for this variable were found either in PER (Δ = - 0.3 ± 0.1; P = 0.071; ES = - 0.06) or in SER (Δ = - 0.2 ± 0.1; P = 0.578; ES = - 0.04). There were no significant changes in the strength-related variables. No between-group differences were found in any of the variables.

conclusionA PER has similar effects to a SER on body composition and strength in resistance-trained women performing a CT program. Given that PER is more flexible and thus may enhance dietary adherence, it might be a better alternative for FM reduction compared to SER.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdipose TissueBody CompositionDietFemaleHumansMuscle StrengthCalorie restricted dietConcurrent trainingFat reductionHypertrophyMuscle strengthResistance training

Identifiers

PMID36802029
PMCPMC10191959
OpenAlexW4321187033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.