ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Umbilical cord blood gases sampling in low-risk vaginal deliveries as a predictor of adverse neonatal outcome.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Umbrella review and meta-analysis of the effect of delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of labor on neonatal outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is no clear correlation between abnormal umbilical cord blood gas studies (UCGS) and adverse neonatal outcome in low-risk deliveries. We investigated the need for its routine use in low-risk deliveries.
methodsWe retrospectively compared maternal, neonatal, and obstetrical characteristics among low-risk deliveries (2014-2022) between "normal" and "abnormal" pH groups: A:normal pH ≥ 7.15; abnormal pH < 7.15; B: normal pH ≥ 7.15 and base excess (BE) > - 12 mmol/L; abnormal pH < 7.15 and BE ≤ We retrospectively compared 12 mmol/L; C: normal pH ≥ 7.1; abnormal pH < 7.1; D: normal pH > 7.1 and BE > - 12 mmol/L; abnormal pH < 7.1 and BE ≤ - 12 mmol/L.
resultsOf 14,338 deliveries, the rates of UCGS were: A-0.3% (n = 43); B-0.07% (n = 10); C-0.11% (n = 17); D-0.03% (n = 4). The primary outcome, composite adverse neonatal outcome (CANO) occurred in 178 neonates with normal UCGS (1.2%) and in only one case with UCGS (2.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of UCGS as a predictor of CANO were high (99.7-99.9%) and low (0.56-0.59%), respectively.
conclusionUCGS were an uncommon finding in low-risk deliveries and its association with CANO was not clinically relevant. Consequently, its routine use should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36801967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.