ArticleScientific reports2023
Systematic analysis of CNGA3 splice variants identifies different mechanisms of aberrant splicing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tackling non-canonical splicing in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy to reduce the uncertain significance variants burden.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic functional evaluation of CNGA1 missense variants associated with retinitis pigmentosa.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive functional splicing analysis of non-canonical CNGB3 variants using in vitro minigene splice assays.The Journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Genetic phenotypic characteristics and inheritance patterns of patients with achromatopsia at a large academic institution and a review of the literature and gene therapies.Molecular vision · 2025Review
- Splicing defects and CRISPR-Cas9 correction in isogenic homozygous photoreceptor precursors harboring clustered deep-intronic ABCA4 variants.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
- Reclassifying BRCA1 c.4358-2A > G and BRCA2 c.475 + 5G > C variants from "Uncertain Significance" to "Pathogenic" based on minigene assays and clinical evidence.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Case Report: NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achromatopsia is an autosomal recessive cone photoreceptor disease that is frequently caused by pathogenic variants in the CNGA3 gene. Here, we present a systematic functional analysis of 20 CNGA3 splice site variants detected in our large cohort of achromatopsia patients and/or listed in common variant databases. All variants were analyzed by functional splice assays based on the pSPL3 exon trapping vector. We demonstrated that ten variants, both at canonical and non-canonical splice sites, induced aberrant splicing, including intronic nucleotide retention, exonic nucleotide deletion and exon skipping, resulting in 21 different aberrant transcripts. Of these, eleven were predicted to introduce a premature termination codon. The pathogenicity of all variants was assessed based on established guidelines for variant classification. Incorporation of the results of our functional analyses enabled re-classification of 75% of variants previously classified as variants of uncertain significance into either likely benign or likely pathogenic. Our study is the first in which a systematic characterization of putative CNGA3 splice variants has been performed. We demonstrated the utility of pSPL3 based minigene assays in the effective assessment of putative splice variants. Our findings improve the diagnosis of achromatopsia patients, who may thus benefit from future gene-based therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.