ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2023
Slide-to-Slide Tissue Transfer and Array Assembly From Limited Samples for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.
Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue microarrays (TMA) have become an important tool in high-throughput molecular profiling of tissue samples in the translational research setting. Unfortunately, high-throughput profiling in small biopsy specimens or rare tumor samples (eg, orphan diseases or unusual tumors) is often precluded owing to limited amounts of tissue. To overcome these challenges, we devised a method that allows tissue transfer and construction of TMAs from individual 2- to 5-μm sections for subsequent molecular profiling. We named the technique slide-to-slide (STS) transfer, and it requires a series of chemical exposures (so-called xylene-methacrylate exchange) in combination with rehydrated lifting, microdissection of donor tissues into multiple small tissue fragments (methacrylate-tissue tiles), and subsequent remounting on separate recipient slides (STS array slide). We developed the STS technique by assessing the efficacy and analytical performance using the following key metrics: (a) dropout rate, (b) transfer efficacy, (c) success rates using different antigen-retrieval methods, (d) success rates of immunohistochemical stains, (e) fluorescent in situ hybridization success rates, and (f) DNA and (g) RNA extraction yields from single slides, which all functioned appropriately. The dropout rate ranged from 0.7% to 6.2%; however, we applied the same STS technique successfully to fill these dropouts ("rescue" transfer). Hematoxylin and eosin assessment of donor slides confirmed a transfer efficacy of >93%, depending on the size of the tissue (range, 76%-100%). Fluorescent in situ hybridization success rates and nucleic acid yields were comparable with those of traditional workflows. In this study, we present a quick, reliable, and cost-effective method that offers the key advantages of TMAs and other molecular techniques-even when tissue is sparse. The perspectives of this technology in biomedical sciences and clinical practice are promising, given that it allows laboratories to create more data with less tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.