Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36801425›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2023

Peg Forest Rehabilitation - A novel spatial navigation based cognitive rehabilitation paradigm for experimental neurotrauma.

L Matthew Law, Daniel R Griffiths, Jonathan Lifshitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L Matthew LawPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States; University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States; BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States. Electronic address: mlaw77@arizona.edu.
Daniel R GriffithsPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States; University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States; BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Jonathan LifshitzPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States; University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States; BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Barrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

Neural circuit disruption by diffuse brain injury: basis for morbidity & therapyR01NS065052 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Brain injury rehabilitation modality, regulation, & structural plasticityI01RX002472 · VA · PHOENIX VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN · 2018 to 2023
–
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065052RRD VA I01 RX002472RRD VA I01 RX002691RRD VA I01 RX004536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results from mechanical forces applied to the head. Ensuing cascades of complex pathophysiology transition the injury event into a disease process. The enduring constellation of emotional, somatic, and cognitive impairments degrade quality of life for the millions of TBI survivors suffering from long-term neurological symptoms. Rehabilitation strategies have reported mixed results, as most have not focused on specific symptomatology or explored cellular processes. The current experiments evaluated a novel cognitive rehabilitation paradigm for brain-injured and uninjured rats. The arena is a plastic floor with a cartesian grid of holes for plastic dowels to create new environments with the rearrangement of threaded pegs. Rats received either two weeks of Peg Forest rehabilitation (PFR) or open field exposure starting at 7 days post-injury; or one week starting at either day 7 or 14 post-injury; or served as caged controls. Cognitive performance was assessed on a battery of novel object tasks at 28 days post-injury. The results revealed that two weeks of PFR was required to prevent the onset of cognitive impairments, while one week of PFR was insufficient regardless of when rehabilitation was initiated after injury. Further assessment of the task showed that novel daily arrangements of the environment were required to impart the cognitive performance benefits, as exposure to a static arrangement of pegs for PFR each day did not improve cognitive performance. The results indicate that PFR prevents the onset of cognitive disorders following acquired a mild to moderate brain injury, and potentially other neurological conditions.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticSpatial NavigationAnimalsCognitive TrainingHumansQuality of LifeRatsCognitive impairmentCognitive rehabilitationExploratory behaviorImproved cognitionSpatial navigationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36801425
PMCPMC10883691
OpenAlexW4321205478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.