Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800427›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

The evolution of universal cooperation.

Jörg Gross, Zsombor Z Méder, Carsten K W De Dreu, Angelo Romano, Welmer E Molenmaker, Laura C Hoenig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Evolutionary-Ecological Basis of Xenophilia.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. The co-occurrence of ingroup and outgroup prosociality requires cross-group partner choice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The co-occurrence of ingroup and outgroup prosociality across 121 societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. How we manage medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Indirect reciprocity can foster large-scale cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Reply to Gross et al.: Indirect reciprocity undermines large-scale cooperation under realistic conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. The nasty neighbor effect in humans.Science advances · 2024
    Article
  13. Indirect reciprocity undermines indirect reciprocity destabilizing large-scale cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jörg GrossDepartment of Psychology, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5403-9475
Zsombor Z MéderInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-9433
Carsten K W De DreuInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-4611
Angelo RomanoInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Welmer E MolenmakerInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-2829
Laura C HoenigInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-6648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans work together in groups to tackle shared problems and contribute to local club goods that benefit other group members. Whereas benefits from club goods remain group bound, groups are often nested in overarching collectives that face shared problems like pandemics or climate change. Such challenges require individuals to cooperate across group boundaries, raising the question how cooperation can transcend beyond confined groups. Here, we show how frequent intergroup interactions allow groups to transition from group-bound to universal cooperation. With frequent intergroup interactions, reciprocity of cooperative acts permeates group boundaries and enables the evolution of universal cooperation. As soon as intergroup interactions take place frequently, people start to selectively reward cooperation aimed at benefitting everyone, irrespective of their group membership. Simulations further show that it becomes more difficult to overcome group-bound cooperation when populations are fragmented into many small groups. Our findings reveal important prerequisites for the evolution of universal cooperation.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGroup ProcessesBiological EvolutionGame TheoryHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID36800427
PMCPMC9937576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.