Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800382›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Study of Camellia sinensis diploid and triploid leaf development mechanism based on transcriptome and leaf characteristics.

Xinzhuan Yao, Yong Qi, Hufang Chen, Baohui Zhang, Zhengwu Chen, Litang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinzhuan YaoCollege of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-8538
Yong QiGuizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China.
Hufang ChenCollege of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Baohui ZhangCollege of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhengwu ChenGuizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China.
Litang LuCollege of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidization results in significant changes in the morphology and physiology of plants, with increased growth rate and genetic gains as the number of chromosomes increases. In this study, the leaf functional traits, photosynthetic characteristics, leaf cell structure and transcriptome of Camellia sinensis were analyzed. The results showed that triploid tea had a significant growth advantage over diploid tea, the leaf area was 59.81% larger, and the photosynthetic capacity was greater. The morphological structure of triploid leaves was significantly different, the xylem of the veins was more developed, the cell gap between the palisade tissue and the sponge tissue was larger and the stomata of the triploid leaves were also larger. Transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed that in triploid tea, the changes in leaf morphology and physiological characteristics were affected by the expression of certain key regulatory genes. We identified a large number of genes that may play important roles in leaf development, especially genes involved in photosynthesis, cell division, hormone synthesis and stomata development. This research will enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying tea and stomata development and provide a basis for molecular breeding of high-quality and high-yield tea varieties.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisTranscriptomeDiploidyGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant LeavesTeaTriploidyTea

Identifiers

PMID36800382
PMCPMC9937487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.