Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Direct liquid transmission of sound has little impact on fermentation performance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Rachel Benitez, Alastair Harris, Evie Mansfield, Pat Silcock, Graham Eyres, Silas G Villas-Bôas, Andrew Jeffs, Austen R D Ganley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel BenitezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, New Zealand, New Zealand.
Alastair HarrisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, New Zealand, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-3794
Evie MansfieldSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, New Zealand, New Zealand.
Pat SilcockDepartment of Food Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Graham EyresDepartment of Food Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Silas G Villas-BôasLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Z.A.E. Robert Steichen, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Andrew JeffsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, New Zealand, New Zealand.
Austen R D GanleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, New Zealand, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-7522
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Otago · NZLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sound is a physical stimulus that has the potential to affect various growth parameters of microorganisms. However, the effects of audible sound on microbes reported in the literature are inconsistent. Most published studies involve transmitting sound from external speakers through air toward liquid cultures of the microorganisms. However, the density differential between air and liquid culture could greatly alter the sound characteristics to which the microorganisms are exposed. In this study we apply white noise sound in a highly controlled experimental system that we previously established for transmitting sound underwater directly into liquid cultures to examine the effects of two key sound parameters, frequency and intensity, on the fermentation performance of a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae ale yeast growing in a maltose minimal medium. We performed these experiments in an anechoic chamber to minimise extraneous sound, and find little consistent effect of either sound frequency or intensity on the growth rate, maltose consumption, or ethanol production of this yeast strain. These results, while in contrast to those reported in most published studies, are consistent with our previous study showing that direct underwater exposure to white noise sound has little impact on S. cerevisiae volatile production and sugar utilization in beer medium. Thus, our results suggest the possibility that reported microorganism responses to sound may be an artefact associated with applying sound to cultures externally via transmission through air.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBeerFermentationMaltoseMaltoseSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID36800360
PMCPMC9937469
OpenAlexW4321167560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.