ArticleJAMA network open2023
Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Care and Prognosis in the United States.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and community-level associations of social determinants with pituitary adenoma disparities in the US.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Associations Between Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and the Distribution of Rhinologists in the United States.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Influence of Social and Demographic Factors on Retinoblastoma Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- Individual and Community-Level Social Determinant Associations with Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Disparities in the United States.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Assessments of social vulnerability on central nervous system cancer disparities in the United States.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Utilization of the Child Opportunity Index to Evaluate Timing of Tympanostomy Tube Placement.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Understanding Cancer Health Disparities.Cancers · 2026Review
- Differences in Lung Cancer Survival by Demographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health, United States, 2010-2020.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2026Article
- Social Vulnerability Predictors of Acute Care: Leveraging Health Information Exchange Data to Understand Social Determinants at the Census Tract Level in a Correlational Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Social Vulnerability Index as a Tool to Evaluate the Distribution of Head and Neck Oncology Surgeons.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Assessments of social vulnerability on laryngeal cancer treatment & prognosis in the US.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Causal assessments of multilevel social determinant factors on meningioma disparities in the United States.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- The Impact of Digital Inequities on Nasal and Paranasal-Sinus Cancer Disparities in the United States: A Cohort Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic, racial-ethnic, household, and infrastructural disparities of hematologic cancer outcomes in the United States.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Associations of Social Vulnerability and Race-Ethnicity With Gastrointestinal Cancers in the United States.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health Impact Complications Following Free-Flap Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Social vulnerability and survival in 112 000 adolescents and young adults with cancer: a population-based study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Social vulnerabilities in head-neck melanoma care: A retrospective cohort study in the United States.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Social vulnerability and outcomes of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.JAAD international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Prior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) in pediatric head and neck cancer (HNC) have only considered a narrow scope of HNCs, SDoH, and geography while lacking inquiry into the interrelational association of SDoH with disparities in clinical pediatric HNC. Objectives: To evaluate the association of SDoH with disparities in HNC among children and adolescents and to assess which specific aspects of SDoH are most associated with disparities in dynamic and regional sociodemographic contexts. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included data about patients (aged ≤19 years) with pediatric HNC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to October 2022. Exposures: Overall social vulnerability and its subcomponent contributions from 15 SDoH variables, grouped into socioeconomic status (SES; poverty, unemployment, income level, and high school diploma status), minority and language status (ML; minoritized racial and ethnic group and proficiency with English), household composition (HH; household members aged ≥65 and ≤17 years, disability status, single-parent status), and housing and transportation (HT; multiunit structure, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle, group quarters). These were ranked and scored across all US counties. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regression trends were performed in continuous measures of surveillance and survival period and in discrete measures of advanced staging and surgery receipt. Results: A total of 37 043 patients (20 729 [55.9%] aged 10-19 years; 18 603 [50.2%] male patients; 22 430 [60.6%] White patients) with 30 different HNCs in SEER had significant relative decreases in the surveillance period, ranging from 23.9% for malignant melanomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 170 [128] months to 129 [88] months) to 41.9% for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 216 [142] months vs 127 [94] months). SES followed by ML and HT vulnerabilities were associated with these overall trends per relative-difference magnitudes (eg, SES for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors: mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 114 [113] months vs 86 [84] months; P < .001). Differences in mean survival time were observed with increasing social vulnerability, ranging from 11.3% for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 46 [46] months to 41 [48] months; P = .43) to 61.4% for gliomas not otherwise specified (NOS) (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 44 [84] months to 17 [28] months; P < .001), with ML vulnerability followed by SES, HH, and HT being significantly associated with decreased survival (eg, ML for gliomas NOS: mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 42 [84] months vs 19 [35] months; P < .001). Increased odds of advanced staging with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.45) and retinoblastomas (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50) and decreased odds of surgery receipt for melanomas (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91) and rhabdomyosarcomas (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98) were associated with increasing overall social vulnerability. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with pediatric HNC, significant decreases in receipt of care and survival time were observed with increasing SDoH vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.