Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800143›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2023

Segmentation of the aorta in systolic phase from 4D flow MRI: multi-atlas vs. deep learning.

Diana M Marin-Castrillon, Leonardo Geronzi, Arnaud Boucher, Siyu Lin, Marie-Catherine Morgant, Alexandre Cochet, Michel Rochette, Sarah Leclerc, Khalid Ambarki, Ning Jin and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Synthetically trained convolutional neural networks for time-resolved aortic segmentation of four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Diana M Marin-CastrillonImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Leonardo GeronziUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Arnaud BoucherImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Siyu LinImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Marie-Catherine MorgantImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Alexandre CochetImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Michel RochetteAnsys, Lyon, France.
Sarah LeclercImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Khalid AmbarkiSiemens Medical Solutions, Nancy, France.
Ning JinSiemens Medical Solutions, Nancy, France.
Ludwig Serge AhoDepartment of Epidemiology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
Alain LalandeImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Olivier BouchotImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Benoit PreslesImaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France. benoit.presles@u-bourgogne.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the management of the aortic aneurysm, 4D flow magnetic resonance Imaging provides valuable information for the computation of new biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, accurate segmentation of the aorta is required. Thus, our objective is to evaluate the performance of two automatic segmentation methods on the calculation of aortic wall pressure.

methodsAutomatic segmentation of the aorta was performed with methods based on deep learning and multi-atlas using the systolic phase in the 4D flow MRI magnitude image of 36 patients. Using mesh morphing, isotopological meshes were generated, and CFD was performed to calculate the aortic wall pressure. Node-to-node comparisons of the pressure results were made to identify the most robust automatic method respect to the pressures obtained with a manually segmented model.

resultsDeep learning approach presented the best segmentation performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) equal to 0.92+/- 0.02 and 21.02+/- 24.20 mm, respectively. At the global level HD is affected by the performance in the abdominal aorta. Locally, this distance decreases to 9.41+/- 3.45 and 5.82+/- 6.23 for the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. Moreover, with respect to the pressures from the manual segmentations, the differences in the pressures computed from deep learning were lower than those computed from multi-atlas method.

conclusionTo reduce biases in the calculation of aortic wall pressure, accurate segmentation is needed, particularly in regions with high blood flow velocities. Thus, the deep learning segmen-tation method should be preferred.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAorta, AbdominalBlood Flow VelocityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging4D flow MRICFDDeep learning segmentationMulti-atlas segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.