Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800131›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

The deterrent effects of individual monoterpene odours on the dietary decisions of African elephants.

Twané Bester, Melissa H Schmitt, Adrian M Shrader

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Underground Signals: The Ecological Power of Root Volatiles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Twané BesterMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X28, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. twanebest@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-2391
Melissa H SchmittSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Private Bag X11283, Nelspruit, 1200, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-7673
Adrian M ShraderMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X28, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-6132
University of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

National Research Foundation of South Africa 103777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African savanna elephants use pre-ingestive olfactory cues when making dietary choices, and previous research has observed that elephant diet choice is negatively correlated with vegetation species that contain high concentrations of monoterpenes. However, the frequency and concentration of monoterpenes can vary dramatically across plant species. Thus, we aimed to explore the effects that the odours of individual monoterpenes have on elephant diet choice and how these effects vary with concentration. To do this, we conducted three odour-based choice experiments focusing on eight common monoterpenes found in the woody plants in Southern African savannas. In the first experiment, we tested whether elephant diet choice for a frequently consumed plant (Euclea crispa) was influenced by the addition of the odour of an individual monoterpene at a set concentration. In the second experiment, we explored the relative deterrence of each monoterpene. Lastly, we tested how elephant diet choice varied as a function of the addition of individual monoterpene odours at 5%, 10%, and 20% concentrations. We found that the elephants avoided most individual monoterpenes at high concentrations, with the exception being α-pinene. Furthermore, we found that the odours of some individual monoterpenes were, in fact, more deterrent than others. In the third experiment, we found that the elephants avoided β-pinene, limonene, ocimene, γ-terpinene, and terpinolene across all concentrations, but only avoided sabinene and linalool at high concentrations. Ultimately, our results show that the odour of individual monoterpenes may deter elephant consumption, but that this deterrent effect depends on both the monoterpene and its concentration.

Indexed as

ElephantsMonoterpenesAnimalsDietLimoneneOdorantsLimoneneMonoterpenesFood preferenceForagingHerbivoryOlfactionPre-ingestive cuesVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36800131
PMCPMC10066090
OpenAlexW4321169211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.