Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800117›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Screening behaviours, demographics, and stage at diagnosis in the publicly funded Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Nicholas Gold, Rebecca A G Christensen, Jasleen Arneja, Arian Aminoleslami, Geoffrey M Anderson, Jennifer D Brooks

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cancer-related care for rural and remote populations in Canada: A scoping review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas GoldDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-019X
Rebecca A G ChristensenDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-8688
Jasleen ArnejaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-6699
Arian AminoleslamiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-1897
Geoffrey M AndersonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-1343
Jennifer D BrooksDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St. HSB 676, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. jennifer.brooks@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-4256

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) 155465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) offers free screening mammograms every 2 years, to women aged 50-74. Study objectives were to determine demographic characteristics associated with the adherence to OBSP and if women screened in the OBSP have a lower stage at diagnosis than non-screened eligible women.

methodsWe used the Ontario cancer registry (OCR) to identify 48,927 women, aged 51-74 years, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2017. These women were assigned as having undergone adherent screening (N = 26,108), non-adherent screening (N = 6546) or not-screened (N = 16,273) in the OBSP. We used multinomial logistic regression to investigate the demographic characteristics associated with screening behaviour, as well as the association between screening status and stage at diagnosis.

resultsAmong women with breast cancer, those living in rural areas (versus the largest urban areas) had a lower odds of not being screened (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68, 0.78). Women in low-income (versus high-income) communities were more likely not to be screened (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.33, 1.51). When stratified, the association between income and screening status only held in urban areas. Non-screened women were more likely to be diagnosed with stage II (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.82, 2.01), III (OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.76, 3.17), or IV (OR 8.96, 95% CI 7.94, 10.12) disease compared to stage I and were less likely to be diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98).

conclusionsThis study suggests that targeting OBSP recruitment efforts to lower income urban communities could increase screening rates. OBSP adherent women were more likely to be diagnosed with earlier stage disease, supporting the value of this initiative and those like it.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastDemographyFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningOntarioBreast cancerDiagnosisOntarioScreeningStage

Identifiers

PMID36800117
PMCPMC10036268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read206
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.