Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800072›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Predicting the prognosis of lower rectal cancer using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with artificial intelligence.

Ryutaro Udo, Junichi Mazaki, Mikihiro Hashimoto, Tomoya Tago, Kenta Kasahara, Tetsuo Ishizaki, Tesshi Yamada, Yuichi Nagakawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryutaro UdoDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi MazakiDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. junichim@tokyo-med.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-0921
Mikihiro HashimotoDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoya TagoDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenta KasaharaDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo IshizakiDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tesshi YamadaDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi NagakawaDepartment of Digestive and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo Ika Daigaku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are various preoperative treatments that are useful for controlling local or distant metastases in lower rectal cancer. For planning perioperative management, preoperative stratification of optimal treatment strategies for each case is required. However, a stratification method has not yet been established. Therefore, we attempted to predict the prognosis of lower rectal cancer using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with artificial intelligence (AI).

methodsThis study included 54 patients [male:female ratio was 37:17, median age 70 years (range 49-107 years)] with lower rectal cancer who could be curatively resected without preoperative treatment at Tokyo Medical University Hospital from January 2010 to February 2017. In total, 878 preoperative T2 MRIs were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the presence or absence of recurrence, which was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curve of the predicted recurrence (AI stage 1) and predicted recurrence-free (AI stage 0) groups.

resultsFor recurrence prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) values for learning and test cases were 0.748 and 0.757, respectively. For prediction of recurrence in each case, the AUC values were 0.740 and 0.875, respectively. The 5-year RFS rates, according to the postoperative pathologic stage for all patients, were 100%, 64%, and 50% for stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.107). The 5-year RFS rates for AI stages 0 and 1 were 97% and 10%, respectively (p < 0.001 significant difference).

conclusionsWe developed a prognostic model using AI and preoperative MRI images of patients with lower rectal cancer who had not undergone preoperative treatment, and the model could be useful in comparison with pathological classification.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceLower rectal cancerPreoperative treatmentPrognostic factorRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36800072
OpenAlexW4321163252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.