Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36800065›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

Post-treatment outcomes of ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin for definitive therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Zachary A Yetmar, Ryan B Khodadadi, John Raymond Go, Supavit Chesdachai, Omar M Abu Saleh

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptibleAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Management of seriousPaediatrics & child health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia: a matter of dosages?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary A YetmarDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. yetmar.zachary@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-2868
Ryan B KhodadadiDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John Raymond GoDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Supavit ChesdachaiDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Omar M Abu SalehDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is associated with poor outcomes. Ceftriaxone offers logistical advantages over other standard therapies, though in vitro studies have questioned its efficacy and clinical studies of ceftriaxone in MSSA bacteremia are conflicting.We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or antistaphylococcal penicillins as definitive therapy for MSSA bacteremia from 2018 to 2019. Definitive therapy was defined as the antibiotic used in the outpatient setting. Patients were excluded if they received less than 7 days of outpatient therapy. Follow-up started on the date of definitive therapy completion. The primary outcome was 90-day treatment failure, defined as a composite of mortality and microbiologic recurrence. This was analyzed with multivariable Cox regression. A total of 223 patients were included, 37 (16.6%) of whom received ceftriaxone. The most common ceftriaxone dose was 2 g daily (83.8%). The most common primary site of infection was skin/soft tissue (37.2%), unknown (21.1%), and catheter-related (15.2%). Twenty-six (11.7%) developed infective endocarditis. Median total duration of treatment was 31.0 days, and median outpatient duration was 24.0 days. Twenty-six (11.7%) developed 90-day treatment failure. After adjusting for Charlson comorbidity index, duration of therapy, and use of transesophageal echocardiography, definitive treatment with ceftriaxone was associated with treatment failure (hazard ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.15-6.12; p=0.022). Among patients with MSSA bacteremia, definitive treatment with ceftriaxone was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure within 90 days as compared to cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins.

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcal InfectionsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCeftriaxoneHumansMethicillinPenicillinsRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCeftriaxoneMethicillinPenicillinsBloodstream infectionCefazolinCeftriaxoneOxacillinStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID36800065
PMCPMC13041233
OpenAlexW4321169862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.