SynthesisClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023
KCCQ total symptom score, clinical outcome measures, and adverse events associated with omecamtiv mecarbil for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvement of Hemodynamics and Quality of Life Before and After Interatrial Shunt Devices Implantation for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Eligibility for omecamtiv mecarbil in a real-world heart failure population: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOmecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a direct myosin activator that augments left ventricular systolic function. This review compares OM to placebo by evaluating its effect on clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS AND
resultsA literature search of multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating OM versus placebo was undertaken. Six RCTs comprising 9596 patients were included. Use of OM was associated with a reduced risk of stroke (RR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92). There was no significant mean difference (MD) change in the KCCQ total symptom score (MD: 1.82, 95% CI - 1.33 to 4.97), all-cause death (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.93-1.07), hospital readmissions (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.03), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.05; 95% CI 0.83-1.33), cardiovascular death (RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.10), heart failure (HF) events (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.89-1.02), or a composite of cardiovascular death or HF events (RR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-1.02). In addition, OM was associated with an increased risk of dizziness (RR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.04-1.50) and hypotension (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.01-1.36). Other adverse events including ventricular tachyarrhythmias, (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.82-1.11), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter (RR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.46-1.18), dyspnea (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.86-1.18), and acute renal injury (RR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.60-1.27) were not significant.
conclusionOM is generally well tolerated. We identified a reduced risk of stroke with use of OM. However, there was no improvement in other clinical outcomes or quality of life. Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022348423).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.