SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2023
Three-dimensional Quantitative Standards for Assessing Outcomes of Facial Lipotransfer: A Review.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulating endothelial cell dynamics in fat grafting: the impact of DLL4 siRNA via adipose stem cell extracellular vesicles.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable quantitative data are required to address the unpredictability of facial autologous fat grafting (AFG). Facial evaluation by 3D scanning technology is getting popular. However, this process lacks unified standards and the reliability assessments. This study aimed to summarize a set of standards to improve the 3D quantified reliability of AFG outcomes.
methodsA systematic review was used to collect the differences in and limitations of 3D assessments and analyze the effect of the quantification process on the AFG outcomes. Healthy subjects undergoing only one facial structural AFG and 3D assessments were included. The revealed specific issues guided the subsequent narrative review that involves 3D measurement and fat volume retention rate (FVRR) analysis. Criteria were formulated based on the narrative review.
resultsThe systematic review revealed the quantitative process to be operator-dependent. The intra-group FVRR in the postoperative 11+ month group varied significantly (P=.03). The review identified a set of 3D measurement standards, including two optimal software products, two necessary steps for preprocessing, and four testing criteria. We proposed a new calculation formula and parameter and recommended a segmental area analysis for assessing the outcomes of full-face fat grafting.
conclusionsAs far as the 3D evaluation of AFG outcomes is concerned, this is the first study to comprehensively analyze the process and set quantitative criteria. These standards would not only guide future research more reliably, but also provide fresh insight into the review of the past research. 3D measurement standards also apply to all face-related studies requiring 3D registration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.