ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2023
Implementable Deep Learning for Multi-sequence Proton MRI Lung Segmentation: A Multi-center, Multi-vendor, and Multi-disease Study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using quantitative MRI biomarkers.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- 3D Automated Segmentation of Bronchial Abnormalities on Ultrashort Echo Time MRI: A Quantitative MR Outcome in Cystic Fibrosis.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Evaluation of Lung Disorders: Current Status and Future Prospects.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Towards automatical tumor segmentation in radiomics: a comparative analysis of various methods and radiologists for both region extraction and downstream diagnosis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Clinical study on improving the diagnostic accuracy of adult elbow joint cartilage injury by multisequence magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Automated lung segmentation on chest MRI in children with cystic fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
27 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecently, deep learning via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has largely superseded conventional methods for proton ( PURPOSE: Develop a generalizable CNN for lung segmentation in STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 809 FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5-T and 3-T/3D spoiled-gradient recalled and ultrashort echo-time ASSESSMENT: 2D and 3D CNNs, trained on single-center, multi-sequence data, and the conventional spatial fuzzy c-means (SFCM) method were compared to manually delineated expert segmentations. Each method was validated on external data originating from several centers. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average boundary Hausdorff distance (Average HD), and relative error (XOR) metrics to assess segmentation performance. STATISTICAL TESTS: Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed significances of differences between acquisitions in the testing set. Friedman tests with post hoc multiple comparisons assessed differences between the 2D CNN, 3D CNN, and SFCM. Bland-Altman analyses assessed agreement with manually derived lung volumes. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe 3D CNN significantly outperformed its 2D analog and SFCM, yielding a median (range) DSC of 0.961 (0.880-0.987), Average HD of 1.63 mm (0.65-5.45) and XOR of 0.079 (0.025-0.240) on the testing set and a DSC of 0.973 (0.866-0.987), Average HD of 1.11 mm (0.47-8.13) and XOR of 0.054 (0.026-0.255) on external validation data. DATA
conclusionThe 3D CNN generated accurate EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.