Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36799130›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2023

Emotional distress predicts palliative cancer care attitudes: The unique role of anger.

Brenna Mossman, Laura M Perry, James I Gerhart, Laurie E McLouth, Ashley B Lewson, Michael Hoerger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brenna MossmanDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3343-111X
Laura M PerryDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
James I GerhartDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6661-6401
Laurie E McLouthDepartment of Behavioral Science, Markey Cancer Center, Center for Health Equity Transformation, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4888-6520
Ashley B LewsonDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Michael HoergerDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001996 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BUSH, MATTHEW LEE, KELLY, THOMAS H. · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
Cancer Prevention, Control, and Survivorship Research Training ProgramT32CA193193 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Brian L Hitsman, BETINA YANEZ · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001996NCI NIH HHS T32 CA193193NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough palliative care can mitigate emotional distress, distressed patients may be less likely to engage in timely palliative care. This study aims to investigate the role of emotional distress in palliative care avoidance by examining the associations of anger, anxiety, and depression with palliative care attitudes.

methodsPatients (N = 454) with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses completed an online survey on emotional distress and palliative care attitudes. Emotional distress was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System anger, anxiety, and depression scales. The Palliative Care Attitudes Scale was used to measure palliative care attitudes. Regression models tested the impact of a composite emotional distress score calculated from all three symptom measures, as well as individual anger, anxiety, and depression scores, on palliative care attitudes. All models controlled for relevant demographic and clinical covariates.

resultsRegression results revealed that patients who were more emotionally distressed had less favorable attitudes toward palliative care (p < 0.001). In particular, patients who were angrier had less favorable attitudes toward palliative care (p = 0.013) while accounting for depression, anxiety, and covariates. Across analyses, women had more favorable attitudes toward palliative care than men, especially with regard to beliefs about palliative care effectiveness.

conclusionsAnger is a key element of emotional distress and may lead patients to be more reluctant toward timely utilization of palliative care. Although psycho-oncology studies routinely assess depression or anxiety, more attention to anger is warranted. More research is needed on how best to address anger and increase timely utilization of palliative cancer care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPsychological DistressAngerAnxietyAttitudeDepressionEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePalliative Careangeranxietyattitudecancerdepressionemotionsoncologypalliative carepalliative medicinepsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID36799130
PMCPMC10164101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.