Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36799113›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2023

Addressing current challenges in optimization of lipid management following an ACS event: Outcomes of the ACS EuroPath III initiative.

Alberico L Catapano, Raffaele De Caterina, J Wouter Jukema, Robert Klempfner, Ulf Landmesser, François Schiele, Alessandro Sionis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Alberico L CatapanoDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Raffaele De CaterinaDivision of Cardiovascular, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, Pisa University Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, and Fondazione Villaserena per la Ricerca, Città Sant'Angelo, Pescara, Italy.
J Wouter JukemaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3246-8359
Robert KlempfnerCardiac Rehabilitation Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
François SchieleDepartment of Cardiology, University of Burgundy Franche-Comte, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Alessandro SionisDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0843-9512
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLTel Aviv University · ILUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité de Bourgogne · FRUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

Sanofi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering is key to reduce atherosclerotic disease progression and recurrent events for patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, LDL-C management for post-ACS patients remains challenging in clinical practice. HYPOTHESIS: The ACS EuroPath III project was designed to optimize LDL-C management in post-ACS patients by promoting guideline implementation and translating existing evidence into effective actions.

methodsThree surveys targeting cardiologists (n = 555), general practitioners (GPs; n = 445), and patients (n = 662) were conducted in Europe, with the aim of capturing information on patient characteristics and treatment during acute phase, discharge and follow-up. GPs' and patients' opinions on key treatment aspects were also collected. Based on survey results, international experts and clinicians identified areas of improvement and generated prototype solutions. Participants voted to select the most feasible and replicable proposals for co-development and implementation.

resultsFive key areas of improvement were identified: (1) inappropriate treatment prescribed at discharge; (2) lack of lipid guidance in the discharge letter; (3) inadequate lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) optimization; (4) gaps in guideline knowledge and lack of referral practices for GPs; (5) patients' concerns about lipid management. Proposed solutions for these focus areas included development of a treatment algorithm for the acute phase, a standardized GP discharge letter, an assessment tool for LLT efficacy at follow-up, an education plan for GPs/patients and a patient engagement discharge kit. The standardized GP discharge letter and treatment algorithm have been selected as the highest priority solutions for development.

conclusionThese initiatives have the potential to improve adherence to guidelines and patient management after ACS.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAtherosclerosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCholesterol, LDLEuropeHumansPatient DischargeCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsacute coronary syndromescardiovascular riskLDL cholesterollipid-lowering treatmentsmyocardial infarctionPCSK9 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36799113
PMCPMC10106658
OpenAlexW4321166185

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.