ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2023
The Clinical Predictive Score for Prehospital Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Asian Country.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing RAMA-LVO with other Prehospital Large-Vessel Occlusion Prediction Scales in Suspected Acute Stroke; A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large vessel occlusive (LVO) stroke causes severe disabilities and occurs in more than 37% of strokes. Reperfusion therapy is the gold standard of treatment. Studies proved that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is more beneficial and decreases mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the factor associated with LVO stroke in an Asian population and to develop the scores to predict LVO in a prehospital setting. The score will hugely contribute to the future of stroke care in prehospital settings in the aspect of transferal suspected LVO stroke patients to appropriate EVT-capable stroke centers. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study using an exploratory model at the emergency department of Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between January 2018 and December 2020. We included the stroke patients aged >18 who visit ED and an available radiologic report representing LVO. Those whose stroke onset was >24 hours and no radiologic report were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis developed the prediction model and score for LVO stroke. Results: A total of 252 patients met the inclusion criteria; 61 cases (24%) had LVO stroke. Six independent factors were significantly predictive: comorbidity with atrial fibrillation, clinical hemineglect, gaze deviation, facial palsy, aphasia, and cerebellar sign abnormality. The predicted score had an accuracy of 92.5%. The LVO risk score was categorized into three groups: low risk (LVO score <3), moderate risk (LVO score 3-6), and high risk (LVO score >6). The positive likelihood ratio to predicting LVO stroke were 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.26), 2.33 (95% CI 1.53-3.53) and 45.40 (95% CI 11.16-184.78), respectively. Conclusion: The Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) Risk Score provides a screening tool for predicting LVO stroke. A clinical predictive score of ≥3 appears to be associated with LVO stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.