Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798798›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Microbiological Profile of Infectious Keratitis During Covid-19 Pandemic.

Mário Lima-Fontes, Daniel Martinho-Dias, Mariana Leuzinger-Dias, Ana Maria Cunha, Pedro Neves Cardoso, Luís Torrão, Raúl Moreira, Fernando Falcão-Reis, João Pinheiro-Costa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mário Lima-FontesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9126-3505
Daniel Martinho-DiasDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, 4050-313, Portugal.
Mariana Leuzinger-DiasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-0195
Ana Maria CunhaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8519-8786
Pedro Neves CardosoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
Luís TorrãoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-6860
Raúl MoreiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
Fernando Falcão-ReisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
João Pinheiro-CostaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-4045
Hospital de São João · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTSan Antonio College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Covid-19 pandemic introduced significant changes in our daily life, including the widespread use of face masks. The purpose of this study was to assess if significant changes occurred in the microbiological profile of infectious keratitis. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was performed, based on a survey review of the electronic medical records of all patients with presumed infectious keratitis, between March 2020 and October 2021. The microbiological isolates in this sample (pandemic group) were compared with those obtained in our center between 2009 and 2018 (pre-pandemic group). Results: A total of 194 samples were included in the pandemic group. We obtained a culture-positivity rate of 43.3%, which was significantly higher when compared with the pre-pandemic data (35.15%, p = 0.033). Several further significant differences were found between the pandemic and the pre-pandemic groups: the proportion of bacteria, including gram-positive and gram-negative groups, was higher in our sample (pre-pandemic vs pandemic: 76.78% vs 83.33%, p = 0.010; 53.35% vs 60.71%, p = 0.016; 23.43% vs 34.52%, p = 0.005, respectively); two populations of Gram-positive bacteria found in this study were not isolated in the pre-pandemic sample - Conclusion: In conclusion, significant changes were found in the microbiological profile of infectious keratitis in our center during the Covid-19 pandemic. While these changes could be related to face mask use, more observational and experimental studies are needed to explore this possible association.

Indexed as

Covid-19face maskinfectious keratitismicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID36798798
PMCPMC9926925
OpenAlexW4319787836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.