Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798623›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Comparison of Protein B Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) With IS6110 PCR for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis Patients.

Vineet Sehgal, Megha Sharma, Priyal Lnu, Kusum Sharma, Aman Sharma, Navneet Sharma, Manish Modi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. An overview on central nervous system tuberculosis (CNS-TB) focusing on cognitive impairments.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vineet SehgalNeurology, Amandeep Medicity, Amritsar, IND.
Megha SharmaMicrobiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Bilaspur, IND.
Priyal LnuNeurology, Sehgal's Neuro and Child Care Center, Amritsar, IND.
Kusum SharmaNeurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Aman SharmaEmergency Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Navneet SharmaEmergency Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Manish ModiNeurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Indian Institute of Management Amritsar · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a diagnostic challenge. With the conventional staining and culture techniques being too insensitive and time-consuming, and the commercial detection systems being costly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) seems lucrative for routine laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of protein b antigen polymerase chain reaction (Pab PCR) for TBM, in comparison to IS6110. Another purpose was to compute a cut-off at which adenosine deaminase (ADA) could diagnose TBM. Material and methods This is a prospective case-control study to measure the diagnostic accuracy of PCR, BACTEC culture, Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, ADA, and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear tests in TBM. CSF from 50 TBM patients (10 confirmed, 40 clinically suspected) and 40 controls was subjected to Pab PCR and IS6110 PCR, and performance was compared against culture and composite reference standards. Results The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Pab PCR in diagnosing TBM were 82%, 100%, 100%, and 81.63%, respectively, and that of IS6110 PCR were 74%, 100%, 100%, and 75.47%, respectively. Both PCRs outperformed culture (p<0.001). Though performance of both PCRs was comparable (p=0.335) with excellent agreement (k=0.86), Pab PCR detected four additional cases, one culture-positive and three culture-negative clinically suspected. ADA of 6.5 IU/L was able to differentiate between TBM and non-TBM with 86% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Conclusions Molecular tools such as PCR have the potential to increase the clinician's ability to diagnose tuberculous meningitis. Pab PCR is a rapid and reliable method for diagnosing TBM in routine microbiology laboratories.

Indexed as

extra pulmonary tuberculosisis6110 pcrmolecular diagnosis of infectious diseasesnucleic acid amplificationtuberculous meningitis

Identifiers

PMID36798623
PMCPMC9926138
OpenAlexW4316253556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.