ArticleResearch and reports in urology2023
Investigating the Impact of Kratom (
Article in Research and reports in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kratom safety and toxicology in the public health context: research needs to better inform regulation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Kratom ( Patients and Methods: Twitter and Reddit (r/Kratom) were accessed to disseminate our survey featuring validated instruments (the International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF, and the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool, PEDT). Sexual health prior to and after 4 weeks of kratom use was assessed. Results: Most males surveyed (n = 165) were 18-40 years old (84.9%), with 95.8% of respondents using it at least weekly and 82.4% using kratom for ≥1 year. Reasons for use included treating pain (39.4%), and mental health conditions (63.6%). Kratom was associated with a positive (37.7%) and negative (20.5%) impact on sexual health. Kratom subjectively increased time to ejaculation in 104 (66.6%) patients, perceived as positive by 62 (59.6%). Seventy-eight patients answered questions about premature ejaculation. The median (with interquartile range, IQR, following;) pre-kratom and kratom use scores were 13.0; 8.0 and 6.5; 5.0, respectively (p < 0.001). Ejaculation before 5 minutes improved after kratom (51.3% vs 12.8%) (p < 0.0001). Following kratom use, patients reported lack of frustration with ejaculation prior to desire (21.8% vs 61.5%) (p < 0.001). The erectile function domain of the IIEF was statistically significantly different however - clinically similar pre-kratom use (29.0; 5.75) versus 27.0; 6.75 during kratom use (p = 0.037). Conclusion: Clinicians treating male sexual health should be aware of kratom and its potential effect on ejaculatory and erectile function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.