Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798458›Full record

ArticleArXiv2023

Network-based statistics distinguish anomic and Broca aphasia.

Xingpei Zhao, Nicholas Riccardi, Dirk-Bart den Ouden, Rutvik H Desai, Julius Fridriksson, Yuan Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingpei ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina.
Nicholas RiccardiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.
Dirk-Bart den OudenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina.
Rutvik H DesaiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina.
Yuan WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Semantic SystemsR01DC017162 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Speech Entrainment Treatment for Broca's AphasiaR21DC014170 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2015 to 2016
$403k
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017162NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphasia is a speech-language impairment commonly caused by damage to the left hemisphere. Due to the complexity of speech-language processing, the neural mechanisms that underpin various symptoms between different types of aphasia are still not fully understood. We used the network-based statistic method to identify distinct subnetwork(s) of connections differentiating the resting-state functional networks of the anomic and Broca groups. We identified one such subnetwork that mainly involved the brain regions in the premotor, primary motor, primary auditory, and primary sensory cortices in both hemispheres. The majority of connections in the subnetwork were weaker in the Broca group than the anomic group. The network properties of the subnetwork were examined through complex network measures, which indicated that the regions in the superior temporal gyrus and auditory cortex bilaterally exhibit intensive interaction, and primary motor, premotor and primary sensory cortices in the left hemisphere play an important role in information flow and overall communication efficiency. These findings underlied articulatory difficulties and reduced repetition performance in Broca aphasia, which are rarely observed in anomic aphasia. This research provides novel findings into the resting-state brain network differences between groups of individuals with anomic and Broca aphasia. We identified a subnetwork of, rather than isolated, connections that statistically differentiate the resting-state brain networks of the two groups, in comparison with standard lesion symptom mapping results that yield isolated connections.

Indexed as

AphasiaBrain network modelfMRILesion symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID36798458
PMCPMC9934734
OpenAlexW4319653568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.