Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798450›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Automatic Segmentation of Uterine Cavity and Placenta on MR Images Using Deep Learning.

Maysam Shahedi, James D Dormer, Quyen N Do, Yin Xi, Matthew A Lewis, Christina L Herrera, Catherine Y Spong, Ananth J Madhuranthakam, Diane M Twickler, Baowei Fei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Deep learning based automatic segmentation of the placenta and uterine cavity on prenatal MR images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maysam ShahediDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX.
James D DormerDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX.
Quyen N DoDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Yin XiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Matthew A LewisDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Christina L HerreraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Catherine Y SpongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Ananth J MadhuranthakamDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Diane M TwicklerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Baowei FeiDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX.

Funding

Image-guided Intravascular Robotic System for Mitral Valve Repair and ImplantsR01HL140325 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DESAI, JAYDEV P., FEI, BAOWEI · 2018 to 2021
$3.0M
ACADEMIC-INDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSLATION OF PET/TRUS GUIDED INTERVENTIONR01CA204254 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FEI, BAOWEI · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
MOLECULAR IMAGING DIRECTED, 3D ULTRASOUND-GUIDED, BIOPSY SYSTEMR01CA156775 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FEI, BAOWEI · 2011 to 2016
$1.7M
STAN-CT: Standardization and Normalization of CT images for Lung Cancer PatientsR21CA231911 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CHEN, JIN, FEI, BAOWEI · 2019 to 2020
$389k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA156775NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204254NCI NIH HHS R21 CA231911NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for the detection of abnormalities affecting maternal and fetal health. In this study, we used a fully convolutional neural network for simultaneous segmentation of the uterine cavity and placenta on MR images. We trained the network with MR images of 181 patients, with 157 for training and 24 for validation. The segmentation performance of the algorithm was evaluated using MR images of 60 additional patients that were not involved in training. The average Dice similarity coefficients achieved for the uterine cavity and placenta were 92% and 80%, respectively. The algorithm could estimate the volume of the uterine cavity and placenta with average errors of less than 1.1% compared to manual estimations. Automated segmentation, when incorporated into clinical use, has the potential to quantify, standardize, and improve placental assessment, resulting in improved outcomes for mothers and fetuses.

Indexed as

deep learningimage segmentationmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Placentauterine cavityuterus

Identifiers

PMID36798450
PMCPMC9929634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.