Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798201›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Explainable Machine Learning Predictions of Perceptual Sensitivity for Retinal Prostheses.

Galen Pogoncheff, Zuying Hu, Ariel Rokem, Michael Beyeler

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Galen PogoncheffDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Zuying HuDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Ariel RokemDepartment of Psychology and the eScience Institute, University of Washington, WA.
Michael BeyelerDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Funding

Virtual prototyping for retinal prosthesis patientsR00EY029329 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BEYELER, MICHAEL · 2020 to 2022
$633k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY029329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide appropriate levels of stimulation, retinal prostheses must be calibrated to an individual's perceptual thresholds ('system fitting'), despite thresholds varying drastically across subjects, across electrodes within a subject, and over time. Although previous work has identified electrode-retina distance and impedance as key factors affecting thresholds, an accurate predictive model is still lacking. To address these challenges, we 1) fitted machine learning (ML) models to a large longitudinal dataset with the goal of predicting individual electrode thresholds and deactivation as a function of stimulus, electrode, and clinical parameters ('predictors') and 2) leveraged explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to reveal which of these predictors were most important. Our models accounted for up to 77% of the perceptual threshold response variance and enabled predictions of whether an electrode was deactivated in a given trial with F1 and AUC scores of up to 0.740 and 0.913, respectively. Deactivation and threshold models identified novel predictors of perceptual sensitivity, including subject age, time since blindness onset, and electrode-fovea distance. Our results demonstrate that routinely collected clinical measures and a single session of system fitting might be sufficient to inform an XAI-based threshold prediction strategy, which may transform clinical practice in predicting visual outcomes.

Indexed as

Argus IIelectrode deactivationexplainable AIperceptual thresholdsRetinal prostheses

Identifiers

PMID36798201
PMCPMC9934792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.