Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36798114›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein enhances the oncolytic activity of the vesicular stomatitis virus.

Almohanad A Alkayyal, Reham Ajina, Marco Cacciabue, Aaesha A Alkayyal, Nizar H Saeedi, Taofik Hussain Alshehry, Feras Kaboha, Mohammed A Alotaibi, Nada Zaidan, Khalid Shah and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Oncolytic virotherapy and tumor microenvironment modulation.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Repurposing the oncolytic virus VSV∆51M as a COVID-19 vaccine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Almohanad A AlkayyalDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Reham AjinaImmunology Research Program, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Marco CacciabueInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Aaesha A AlkayyalCollege of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Nizar H SaeediDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Taofik Hussain AlshehryKing Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, King Saud University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Feras KabohaKing Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, King Saud University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlotaibiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Nada ZaidanKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology-Brigham and Women's Hospital (KACST-BWH) Centre of Excellence for Biomedicine, Joint Centers of Excellence Program, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid ShahCenter for Stem Cell and Translational Immunotherapy (CSTI), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Fayhan AlroqiImmunology Research Program, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Bakur MahmoudCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the research on oncolytic viruses (OVs), a better understanding of how to enhance their replication is key to improving their therapeutic index. Understanding viral replication is important to improve treatment outcomes based on enhanced viral spreading within the tumor milieu. The VSV-Δ51 oncolytic virus has been widely used as an anticancer agent with a high selectivity profile. In this study, we examined the role of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) in enhancing VSV-Δ51 viral production and oncolytic activity. To test this hypothesis, we first generated a novel VSV-Δ51 mutant that encoded the SARS-COV-2 RBD and compared viral spreading and viral yield between VSV-Δ51-RBD and VSV-Δ51

Indexed as

COVID-19Oncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesVesicular StomatitisAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorHumansSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVesicular stomatitis Indiana virusCarrier ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2B16F10 melanoma modelsoncolytic virotherapySARS-CoV-2 RBDVSV-Δ51 enhancementVSV-Δ51 production

Identifiers

PMID36798114
PMCPMC9927213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.