ArticlePhysical review. E2023
Reconstruction of three-dimensional scroll waves in excitable media from two-dimensional observations using deep neural networks.
Article in Physical review. E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Optogenetics for Real-Time Automated Control of Cardiac Electrical Activity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Dreaming of electrical waves: Generative modeling of cardiac excitation waves using diffusion models.APL machine learning · 2024Article
- Reconstructing cardiac electrical excitations from optical mapping recordings.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scroll wave dynamics are thought to underlie life-threatening ventricular fibrillation. However, direct observations of three-dimensional electrical scroll waves remain elusive, as there is no direct way to measure action potential wave patterns transmurally throughout the thick ventricular heart muscle. Here we study whether it is possible to reconstruct simulated scroll waves and scroll wave chaos using deep learning. We trained encoding-decoding convolutional neural networks to predict three-dimensional scroll wave dynamics inside bulk-shaped excitable media from two-dimensional observations of the wave dynamics on the bulk's surface. We tested whether observations from one or two opposing surfaces would be sufficient and whether transparency or measurements of surface deformations enhances the reconstruction. Further, we evaluated the approach's robustness against noise and tested the feasibility of predicting the bulk's thickness. We distinguished isotropic and anisotropic, as well as opaque and transparent, excitable media as models for cardiac tissue and the Belousov-Zhabotinsky chemical reaction, respectively. While we demonstrate that it is possible to reconstruct three-dimensional scroll wave dynamics, we also show that it is challenging to reconstruct complicated scroll wave chaos and that prediction outcomes depend on various factors such as transparency, anisotropy, and ultimately the thickness of the medium compared to the size of the scroll waves. In particular, we found that anisotropy provides crucial information for neural networks to decode depth, which facilitates the reconstructions. In the future, deep neural networks could be used to visualize intramural action potential wave patterns from epi- or endocardial measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.