Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797845›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Management of COVID-19 and vaccination in Nepal: A qualitative study.

Alisha Karki, Barsha Rijal, Bikash Koirala, Prabina Makai, Pramod Kc, Pratik Adhikary, Saugat Joshi, Srijana Basnet, Sunita Bhattarai, Jiban Karki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of COVID-19 and vaccination in Nepal: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alisha KarkiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-6058
Barsha RijalPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Bikash KoiralaPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Prabina MakaiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Pramod KcPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Pratik AdhikaryPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Saugat JoshiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Srijana BasnetPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Sunita BhattaraiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Jiban KarkiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this research is to investigate the perspective of citizens of Nepal on the management COVID-19, the roll-out of the vaccine, and to gain an understanding of attitudes towards the governments' handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodA qualitative methodology was used. In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 males and 23 females aged between 20 and 86 years old from one remote and one urban district of Nepal. Interviews were conducted in November and December 2021. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data, utilising NVivo 12 data management software.

resultThree major themes were identified: (1) Peoples' perspective on the management of COVID-19, (2) people's perception of the management of COVID-19 vaccination and (3) management and dissemination of information. It was found that most participants had heard of COVID-19 and its mitigation measures, however, the majority had limited understanding and knowledge about the disease. Most participants expressed their disappointment concerning poor testing, quarantine, vaccination campaigns and poor accountability from the government towards the management of COVID-19. Misinformation and stigma were reported as the major factors contributing to the spread of COVID-19. People's knowledge and understanding were mainly shaped by the quality of the information they received from various sources of communication and social media. This heavily influenced their response to the pandemic, the preventive measures they followed and their attitude towards vaccination.

conclusionOur study concludes that the study participants' perception was that testing, quarantine centres and vaccination campaigns were poorly managed in both urban and rural settings in Nepal. Since people's knowledge and understanding of COVID-19 are heavily influenced by the quality of information they receive, we suggest providing contextualised correct information through a trusted channel regarding the pandemic, its preventive measures and vaccination. This study recommends that the government proactively involve grassroots-level volunteers like Female Community Health Volunteers to effectively prepare for future pandemics. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was based on in-depth interviews with 41 people from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. This study would not have been possible without their participation.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNepalPandemicsVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVIDmanagementNepalruralurbanvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36797845
PMCPMC10154840
OpenAlexW4321167756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.