Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797796›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Enhanced

Nicholas Bryden, Sebastian W Atalla, Michele Kelley, Leah R Holmes, Rosa T Branca

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas BrydenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-3055
Sebastian W AtallaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Michele KelleyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Leah R HolmesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Rosa T BrancaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Sensitive and Specific detection of BAT Tissue and Activity by Magnetic Resonance with Hyperpolarized Xe-129R01DK108231 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRANCA, ROSA TAMARA · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Enabling accurate identification and quantification of brown adipose tissue mass by xenon enhanced computed tomographyR01DK123206 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRANCA, ROSA TAMARA · 2020 to 2021
$866k
Gas microbubbles as a hyperpolarized-xenon carrier and as a contrast agent for MRIR21EB031319 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRANCA, ROSA TAMARA · 2021 to 2022
$413k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB031319NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB031319NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108231NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK108231NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123206NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK123206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effect of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) on the T

methods

resultsThe SPION relaxivity was substantially greater at low field for

conclusionSPIONs longitudinal relaxivity increases at low field both for

Indexed as

Magnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesXenonMagnetic FieldsMagnetic Resonance ImagingXenon IsotopesXenonXenon Isotopesdissolved-phasehyperpolarized xenonlow-field MRISPIONT1

Identifiers

PMID36797796
PMCPMC10963042
OpenAlexW4321170154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.