ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023
Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking Regret: Reappraisal Tendencies Buffer Regret for ICU Surrogates Following Patient Death.Western journal of nursing research · 2025Trial
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Intensive Care Unit Consultation.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship between decision regret, anxiety, and depression in surrogate decision-makers for neurocritical patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a cross-lagged analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making With a Surrogate for Life-Sustaining Treatment of Critically Ill Patients: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Predicting 6-month decisional regret among family surrogate decision-makers of ICU patients: development and internal validation of prediction models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- The Effect of Shared Decision-Making on Emergency Management Knowledge, Anxiety, and Mental Health Among Family Members of Terminally Ill Patients in the ICU: A Quasiexperimental Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Frailty-Informed Decision Making During Acute Health Crises: A Competency-Based Framework for Person-Centered Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies after cardiac arrest.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
- Comment on "Exploring patient decision regret following robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective cohort study".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Advance Care Planning and Decision Regret Among Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Neurology · 2025Article
- Conversations Between Family Members and Physicians in Intensive Care Unit During Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Observational Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Differences in Critical Care Near the End of Life: A Narrative Review.Critical care clinics · 2024Review
- Achieving Goals of Care Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study.Chest · 2024Article
- Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: recent advances in enrichment strategies, sub-phenotyping and clinical trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Factors Associated with Do Not Resuscitate Status and Palliative Care in Hospitalized Patients: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.Palliative medicine reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether surrogate decision makers regret decisions about the use of life support for incapacitated, critically ill patients remain uncertain. We sought to determine the prevalence of decision regret among surrogates of adult ICU patients and identify factors that influence regret.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from the PARTNER 2 trial, which tested a family support intervention for surrogates of critically ill adults. At 6-month follow-up, surrogates rated their regret about life support decisions using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more regret. We used multiple linear regression to identify covariates associated with decision regret based on a psychological construct of regret. We constructed two models using the full cohort; model 1 included patient outcomes; model 2 focused on covariates known at the time of ICU decision-making. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on patient survival status at hospital discharge and 6-month follow-up.
results748 of 848 surrogates had complete DRS data. The median (IQR) DRS score was 15 (0, 25). Overall, 54% reported mild regret (DRS 5-25), 19% moderate-strong regret (DRS 30-100), and 27% no regret (DRS 0). Poor patient outcome at 6 months (death or severe functional dependence) was associated with more regret in model 1 (β 10.1; 95% C.I. 3.2, 17.0). In model 2, palliative care consultation (3.0; 0.1, 5.9), limitations in life support (LS) prior to death (6.3; 3.1, 9.4) and surrogate black race (6.3; 0.3, 12.3) were associated with more regret. Other modulators of regret in subgroup analyses included surrogate age and education level, surrogate-patient relationship, death in hospital (compared to the post-discharge period), and code status at time of ICU admission.
conclusionsOne in five ICU surrogate decision makers experience moderate to strong regret about life support decisions in ICU. Poor patient outcomes are linked to more regret. Decisions to limit life support prior to patient death may also increase regret. Future studies are needed to understand how regret relates to decision quality and how to lessen lasting regret.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.