Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797774›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2023

The transgenic IG-DMR sequence of the mouse Dlk1-Dio3 domain acquired imprinted DNA methylation during the post-fertilization period.

Hitomi Matsuzaki, Shokichi Sugihara, Keiji Tanimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epigenetic control and genomic imprinting dynamics of the Dlk1-Dio3 domain.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hitomi MatsuzakiFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Life Science Center for Survival Dynamics, Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance (TARA), University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.
Shokichi SugiharaGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.
Keiji TanimotoFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Life Science Center for Survival Dynamics, Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance (TARA), University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan. keiji@tara.tsukuba.ac.jp.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H03134Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19KK0384Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP20H05379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllele-specific methylation of the imprinting control region (ICR) is the molecular basis for the genomic imprinting phenomenon that is unique to placental mammals. We previously showed that the ICR at the mouse H19 gene locus (H19 ICR) was unexpectedly established after fertilization and not during spermatogenesis in transgenic mice (TgM), and that the same activity was essential for the maintenance of paternal methylation of the H19 ICR at the endogenous locus in pre-implantation embryos. To examine the universality of post-fertilization imprinted methylation across animal species or imprinted loci, we generated TgM with two additional sequences.

resultsThe rat H19 ICR, which is very similar in structure to the mouse H19 ICR, unexpectedly did not acquire imprinted methylation even after fertilization, suggesting a lack of essential sequences in the transgene fragment. In contrast, the mouse IG-DMR, the methylation of which is acquired during spermatogenesis at the endogenous locus, did not acquire methylation in the sperm of TgM, yet became highly methylated in blastocysts after fertilization, but only when the transgene was paternally inherited. Since these two sequences were evaluated at the same genomic site by employing the transgene co-placement strategy, it is likely that the phenotype reflects the intrinsic activity of these fragments rather than position-effect variegation.

conclusionsOur results suggested that post-fertilization imprinted methylation is a versatile mechanism for protecting paternal imprinted methylation from reprogramming during the pre-implantation period.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationRNA, Long NoncodingAnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsFemaleFertilizationGenomic ImprintingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicPlacentaPregnancyRatsSemenCalcium-Binding ProteinsDlk1 protein, mouseDlk1 protein, ratIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingDNA methylationGenomic imprintingImprinting control region

Identifiers

PMID36797774
PMCPMC9936741
OpenAlexW4321018904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.