Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797702›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Complex organisational factors influence multidisciplinary care for patients with hip fractures: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to service delivery.

F Fox, S Drew, C L Gregson, R Patel, Tjs Chesser, A Johansen, M K Javaid, X L Griffin, R Gooberman-Hill

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

F FoxBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. f.fox@bristol.ac.uk.
S DrewBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
C L GregsonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
R PatelBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tjs ChesserDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
A JohansenUniversity Hospital of Wales and School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
M K JavaidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
X L GriffinBone and Joint Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
R Gooberman-HillBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCardiff University · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 22086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip fractures are devastating injuries, with high health and social care costs. Despite national standards and guidelines, substantial variation persists in hospital delivery of hip fracture care and patient outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to identify organisational processes that can be targeted to reduce variation in service provision and improve patient care.

methodsInterviews were conducted with 40 staff delivering hip fracture care in four UK hospitals. Twenty-three anonymised British Orthopaedic Association reports addressing under-performing hip fracture services were analysed. Following Thematic Analysis of both data sources, themes were transposed onto domains both along and across the hip fracture care pathway.

resultsEffective pre-operative care required early alert of patient admission and the availability of staff in emergency departments to undertake assessments, investigations and administer analgesia. Coordinated decision-making between medical and surgical teams regarding surgery was key, with strategies to ensure flexible but efficient trauma lists. Orthogeriatric services were central to effective service delivery, with collaborative working and supervision of junior doctors, specialist nurses and therapists. Information sharing via multidisciplinary meetings was facilitated by joined up information and technology systems. Service provision was improved by embedding hip fracture pathway documents in induction and training and ensuring their consistent use by the whole team. Hospital executive leadership was important in prioritising hip fracture care and advocating service improvement. Nominated specialty leads, who jointly owned the pathway and met regularly, actively steered services and regularly monitored performance, investigating lapses and consistently feeding back to the multidisciplinary team.

conclusionFindings highlight the importance of representation from all teams and departments involved in the multidisciplinary care pathway, to deliver integrated hip fracture care. Complex, potentially modifiable, barriers and facilitators to care delivery were identified, informing recommendations to improve effective hip fracture care delivery, and assist hospital services when re-designing and implementing service improvements.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHip FracturesHospitalsHumansCare pathwayCommunicationHip fractureMultidisciplinary careQualitativeService delivery

Identifiers

PMID36797702
PMCPMC9933012
OpenAlexW4321106578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.