Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797665›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023

Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia lumbar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qianchuang Sun, Chengwei Zhang, Shuyan Liu, Hui Lv, Wei Liu, Zhenxiang Pan, Zhimin Song

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qianchuang SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Chengwei ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Shuyan LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Hui LvDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Zhenxiang PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China.
Zhimin SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, China. 66912520@qq.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

Education Department of Jilin Province JJKH20221078KJ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a newly defined regional anesthesia technique first described in 2016. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of ESP block in improving analgesia following lumbar surgery.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the analgesic efficacy of the ESP block with non-block care for lumbar surgery from inception 3 August 2021. The primary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores during the first 24 h. Postoperative pain was measured as pain at rest and on movement at postoperative 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h expressed on a visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = the most severe pain.

results11 studies involving 775 patients were included in our analysis. The use of ESP block significantly decreased 24-h opioid consumption (WMD, -8.70; 95% CI, -10.48 to -6.93; I

conclusionsESP block provides less opioid consumption and PONV, lower pain scores, and longer time to first analgesic request in patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to general anesthesia alone.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPain ManagementPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidErector spinae plane blockLumbar surgeryMeta-analysisOpioid consumptionPain scores

Identifiers

PMID36797665
PMCPMC9933390
OpenAlexW4321099781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.