Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797543›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

PatchResNet: Multiple Patch Division-Based Deep Feature Fusion Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using MRI Images.

Taha Muezzinoglu, Nursena Baygin, Ilknur Tuncer, Prabal Datta Barua, Mehmet Baygin, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer, Elizabeth Emma Palmer, Kang Hao Cheong, U Rajendra Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taha MuezzinogluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey.
Nursena BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ilknur TuncerInterior Ministry, Elazig, Turkey.
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Management & Enterprise, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Mehmet BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey.
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey. sdogan@firat.edu.tr.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Elizabeth Emma PalmerCentre of Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick, 2031, Australia.
Kang Hao CheongScience, Mathematics and Technology Cluster, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, S487372, Singapore.
U Rajendra AcharyaDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore, 599489, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern computer vision algorithms are based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and both end-to-end learning and transfer learning modes have been used with CNN for image classification. Thus, automated brain tumor classification models have been proposed by deploying CNNs to help medical professionals. Our primary objective is to increase the classification performance using CNN. Therefore, a patch-based deep feature engineering model has been proposed in this work. Nowadays, patch division techniques have been used to attain high classification performance, and variable-sized patches have achieved good results. In this work, we have used three types of patches of different sizes (32 × 32, 56 × 56, 112 × 112). Six feature vectors have been obtained using these patches and two layers of the pretrained ResNet50 (global average pooling and fully connected layers). In the feature selection phase, three selectors-neighborhood component analysis (NCA), Chi2, and ReliefF-have been used, and 18 final feature vectors have been obtained. By deploying k nearest neighbors (kNN), 18 results have been calculated. Iterative hard majority voting (IHMV) has been applied to compute the general classification accuracy of this framework. This model uses different patches, feature extractors (two layers of the ResNet50 have been utilized as feature extractors), and selectors, making this a framework that we have named PatchResNet. A public brain image dataset containing four classes (glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), meningioma, pituitary tumor, healthy) has been used to develop the proposed PatchResNet model. Our proposed PatchResNet attained 98.10% classification accuracy using the public brain tumor image dataset. The developed PatchResNet model obtained high classification accuracy and has the advantage of being a self-organized framework. Therefore, the proposed method can choose the best result validation prediction vectors and achieve high image classification performance.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomedical engineeringBrain image classificationPatchResNetTransfer learningTumor classification

Identifiers

PMID36797543
PMCPMC10287865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.