ArticleScientific reports2023
Coordinate value of the femoral head center estimated using those of the tip of the greater trochanter and lesser trochanter.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have reported estimating the femoral head center (FC) from reference points on the pelvis; however, none have reported estimates obtained from those on the femur. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the estimated point of FC from the coordinate value of the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) and lesser trochanter (LT) using a formula with a three-dimensional measurement technique. We used data from 92 healthy Japanese subjects without any back or knee symptoms and no abnormalities in the hip, knee, or spine on plain radiographs. In our study, the difference in the anteroposterior direction was larger than that in the other directions. We speculate that the accuracy of defining the tip of the LT is difficult in the anteroposterior direction. Moreover, the correlation coefficients were larger for women. The reason for this was unclear because the variation in the proximal femur may be similar in women. We found that the average difference between the actual and calculated values was approximately 2 mm. We considered that the coordinate value of the FC from the tip of the GT could be estimated more accurately using the regression equation compared to previous methods based on pelvic reference points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.