ArticleScientific reports2023
Effect of fluid overload on survival in patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluids in sepsis.BJA education · 2026Review
- Feasibility and acceptability of weight-based net fluid removal during continuous kidney replacement therapy: A nursing survey.Applied nursing research : ANR · 2026Article
- The correlation between blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio and short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury patients aged 50 and above: a large retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Early net ultrafiltration thresholds and mortality in critically ill patients with septic acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of Doppler waveform analysis of common femoral vein in septic patients: a prospective cohort study.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between fluid overload and survival has not been well elucidated in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SIAKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We investigated the optimal cutoff value of fluid overload for predicting mortality and whether minimizing fluid overload through CRRT is associated with a survival benefit in these patients. We examined 543 patients with SIAKI who received CRRT in our intensive care unit. The degree of cumulative fluid overload in relation to body weight was expressed as the percentage fluid overload (%FO). %FO was further subdivided into %FO from AKI diagnosis to CRRT initiation (%FOpreCRRT) and total fluid overload (%FOtotal). The best cutoff value of fluid overload for predicting the 28-day mortality was %FOpreCRRT > 4.6% and %FOtotal > 9.6%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients with %FOpreCRRT > 4.6% and %FOtotal > 9.6% were 1.9 times and 3.37 times more likely to die than those with %FOpreCRRT ≤ 4.6% and %FOtotal ≤ 9.6%. The 28-day mortality was the highest in patients with %FOpreCRRT > 4.6% and %FOtotal > 9.6% (84.7%), followed by those with %FOpreCRRT ≤ 4.6% and %FOtotal > 9.6% (65.0%), %FOpreCRRT > 4.6% and %FOtotal ≤ 9.6% (43.6%), and %FOpreCRRT ≤ 4.6% and %FOtotal ≤ 9.6% (22%). This study demonstrated that fluid overload was independently associated with the 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with SIAKI. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether minimizing fluid overload using CRRT improves the survival of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.