Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797013›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a virtual antenatal intervention for improved diet and iron intake in Kapilvastu district, Nepal: VALID.

Naomi M Saville, Sanju Bhattarai, Helen Harris-Fry, Santosh Giri, Shraddha Manandhar, Joanna Morrison, Andrew Copas, Bibhu Thapaliya, Abriti Arjyal, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi M SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK n.saville@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-3684
Sanju BhattaraiHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Santosh GiriHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shraddha ManandharHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-5963
Bibhu ThapaliyaHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Abriti ArjyalHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-2944
Sushil C BaralHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sara HillmanInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLondon Women's Clinic · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R020485/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite evidence that iron and folic acid (IFA) supplements can improve anaemia in pregnant women, uptake in Nepal is suboptimal. We hypothesised that providing virtual counselling twice in mid-pregnancy, would increase compliance to IFA tablets during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with antenatal care (ANC alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This non-blinded individually randomised controlled trial in the plains of Nepal has two study arms: (1) control: routine ANC; and (2) 'Virtual' antenatal counselling plus routine ANC. Pregnant women are eligible to enrol if they are married, aged 13-49 years, able to respond to questions, 12-28 weeks' gestation, and plan to reside in Nepal for the next 5 weeks. The intervention comprises two virtual counselling sessions facilitated by auxiliary nurse midwives at least 2 weeks apart in mid-pregnancy. Virtual counselling uses a dialogical problem-solving approach with pregnant women and their families. We randomised 150 pregnant women to each arm, stratifying by primigravida/multigravida and IFA consumption at baseline, providing 80% power to detect a 15% absolute difference in primary outcome assuming 67% prevalence in control arm and 10% loss-to-follow-up. Outcomes are measured 49-70 days after enrolment, or up to delivery otherwise. PRIMARY OUTCOME: consumption of IFA on at least 80% of the previous 14 days. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: dietary diversity, consumption of intervention-promoted foods, practicing ways to enhance bioavailability and knowledge of iron-rich foods. Our mixed-methods process evaluation explores acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, coverage (equity and reach), sustainability and pathways to impact. We estimate costs and cost-effectiveness of the intervention from a provider perspective. Primary analysis is by intention-to-treat, using logistic regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethical approval from Nepal Health Research Council (570/2021) and UCL ethics committee (14301/001). We will disseminate findings in peer-reviewed journal articles and by engaging policymakers in Nepal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17842200.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidGravidityHumansIronNepalPregnancyPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFolic AcidIronepidemiologynutrition & dieteticspublic health

Identifiers

PMID36797013
PMCPMC9936277
OpenAlexW4321116754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.