Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36796994›Full record

ArticleSocial science research2023

The mobility effects hypothesis: Methods and applications.

Emma Zang, Michael E Sobel, Liying Luo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social mobility and mental health in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  8. Examining the Impact of Socioeconomic Position Across the Life Course on Cognitive Function and Brain Structure in Healthy Aging.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma ZangDepartment of Sociology, Yale University, USA. Electronic address: emma.zang@yale.edu.
Michael E SobelDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, USA.
Liying LuoDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Columbia University · USPennsylvania State University · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Heterogeneous Effects of Education on Alzheimers Disease and Related Dementia among Demographic Groups: A Multigenerational and Multilevel StudyR01AG078518 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Liying Luo · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
Linked Lives, Linked Health: Health Trajectories of Persons with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers' HealthR21AG074238 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZANG, EMMA · 2021 to 2022
$473k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078518NIA NIH HHS R21 AG074238NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss hypotheses researchers have put forth to explain how outcomes of socially mobile and immobile individuals might differ and/or how mobility experiences are related to outcomes of interest. Next, we examine the methodological literature on this topic, culminating in the development of the diagonal mobility model (DMM, also called the diagonal reference model in some studies), the primary tool of use since the 1980's. We then discuss some of the many applications of the DMM. Although the model was proposed to examine the effects of social mobility on outcomes of interest, the estimated relationships between mobility and outcomes that researchers have called mobility effects are more appropriately regarded as partial associations. When mobility is not associated with outcomes, as is often found in empirical work, the outcomes of movers from origin o to destination d are a weighted average of the outcomes of individuals who remained in states o and d respectively, and the weights capture the relative salience of origins and destinations in the acculturation process. In light of this attractive feature of the model, we briefly develop several generalizations of the current DMM that future researchers should also find useful. Finally, we propose new estimands of mobility effects, based on the explicit notion that a unit effect of mobility is a comparison of an individual with herself under two conditions, one in which she is mobile, the other in which she is immobile, and we discuss some of the challenges in identifying such effects.

Indexed as

Social MobilityHumansAcculturationCausal inferenceDiagonal mobility modelDiagonal reference modelSocial mobility

Identifiers

PMID36796994
PMCPMC9936082
OpenAlexW4309903988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.