Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36796511›Full record

ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2023

Who Needs Epinephrine? Anaphylaxis, Autoinjectors, and Parachutes.

Timothy E Dribin, Susan Waserman, Paul J Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk of anaphylaxis on commercial flights.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Clinical Implications of Incidental Arg r 1 Sensitization Identified by Multiplex Allergy Testing.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adrenaline Auto-Injectors for Preventing Fatal Anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. To the ER? Can Patients Treat Their Anaphylaxis at Home?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Fatal food anaphylaxis in adults and children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  17. Refractory Anaphylaxis: A New Entity for Severe Anaphylaxis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy E DribinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Susan WasermanDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Paul J TurnerNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: p.turner@imperial.ac.uk.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USLung Institute · USMcMaster University · CA

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
KL2 Training ProgramKL2TR001426 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZELLER, MARGARET H · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
Medical Research Council MR/W018616/1NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001426NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International guidelines stipulate that intramuscular (IM) epinephrine (adrenaline) is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, with an established good safety profile. The availability of epinephrine autoinjectors (EAI) has greatly facilitated the lay administration of IM epinephrine in community settings. However, key areas of uncertainty remain around epinephrine usage. These include variations in prescribing EAI, what symptoms should prompt epinephrine administration, whether emergency medical services (EMS) need to be contacted after administration, and whether epinephrine administered via EAI reduces mortality from anaphylaxis or improves quality of life measures. We provide a balanced commentary on these issues. There is increasing recognition that a poor response to epinephrine, particularly after 2 doses, is a useful marker of severity and the need for urgent escalation. It is likely that patients who respond to a single epinephrine dose do not require EMS activation or emergency department transfer, but data are needed to demonstrate the safety of this approach. Lastly, patients at risk of anaphylaxis must be counseled against over-reliance on EAI alone.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalEpinephrineHumansInjections, IntramuscularQuality of LifeEpinephrineAnaphylaxisAutoinjectorEpinephrineOutcomesPrescribing

Identifiers

PMID36796511
PMCPMC10259181
OpenAlexW4320716996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.