ArticleBrain and cognition2023
Overlapping and unique brain responses to cognitive and response inhibition.
Article in Brain and cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Naturalistic assessments across the lifespan: Systematic review of inhibition measures in ecological settings.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Cerebral small vessel disease moderates the association between executive dysfunction and spontaneous neural activity in adults who lost their only child.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Neural signatures and personalized neuromodulation in a subject experiencing context-dependent inhibitory control deficits.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Measuring neurodevelopment of inhibitory control in children using naturalistic virtual reality.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Resting-state connectivity and task-based cortical response in post-stroke executive dysfunction: A fNIRS study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although cognitive inhibition and response inhibition fall under the umbrella term of inhibition, the question remains whether the two aspects of inhibition engage shared or distinct brain regions. The current study is one of the first to examine the neural underpinnings of cognitive inhibition (e.g. the Stroop incongruency effect) and response inhibition (e.g. "no-go" response) within a single task. Adult participants (n = 77) completed an adapted version of the Simon Task in a 3T MRI scanner. The results demonstrated that cognitive and response inhibition recruited a group of overlapping brain regions (inferior frontal cortex, inferior temporal lobe, precentral cortex, parietal cortex). However, a direct comparison of cognitive and response inhibition revealed that the two aspects of inhibition also engaged distinct, task-specific brain regions (voxel-wise FWE corrected p < 0.05). Cognitive inhibition was associated with increases in multiple brain regions within the prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, response inhibition was associated with increases in distinct regions of the prefrontal cortex, right superior parietal cortex, and inferior temporal lobe. Our findings advance the understanding of the brain basis of inhibition by suggesting that cognitive inhibition and response inhibition engage overlapping but distinct brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.