Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795763›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2023

High PrEP uptake and objective longitudinal adherence among HIV-exposed women with personal or partner plans for pregnancy in rural Uganda: A cohort study.

Lynn T Matthews, Esther C Atukunda, Moran Owembabazi, Kato Paul Kalyebera, Christina Psaros, Pooja Chitneni, Craig W Hendrix, Mark A Marzinke, Peter L Anderson, Oluwaseyi O Isehunwa and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03832530 (Adherence to Periconception HIV Risk-reduction Among Uninfected Women in Rural Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03832530 nacompletednot on this map

Adherence to Periconception HIV Risk-reduction Among Uninfected Women in Rural Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsHIV PreventionArmsSafer conception counseling inclusive of periconception PrEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynn T MatthewsDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-6328
Esther C AtukundaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Moran OwembabaziMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Kato Paul KalyeberaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Christina PsarosBehavioral Medicine Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Pooja ChitneniHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-3852
Craig W HendrixDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Mark A MarzinkeDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Peter L AndersonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1200-8494
Oluwaseyi O IsehunwaDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-0026
Kathleen E HurwitzNoviSci, Inc., a Target RWE company, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7468-851X
Kara BennettBennett Statistical Consulting Inc., Ballston Lake, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9465-8983
Winnie MuyindikeMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
David R BangsbergSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health Sciences University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Jessica E HabererHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-3190
Jeanne M MarrazzoDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Mwebesa Bosco BwanaMbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMbarara National Referral Hospital · UGPortland State University · USTarget (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Development and assessment of an HIV disclosure intervention for men in UgandaK23MH126771 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Pooja Rao Chitneni · 2022 to 2026
$964k
Patient-centered mobile technology interventions to improve maternal health in UgandaK43TW011004 · FIC · MBARARA UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY · PI ATUKUNDA, ESTHER CATHYLN · 2018 to 2022
$542k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW011004NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Uganda, fertility rates and adult HIV prevalence are high, and many women conceive with partners living with HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV acquisition for women and, therefore, infants. We developed the Healthy Families-PrEP intervention to support PrEP use as part of HIV prevention during periconception and pregnancy periods. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study to evaluate oral PrEP use among women participating in the intervention. METHODS AND

findingsWe enrolled HIV-negative women with plans for pregnancy with a partner living, or thought to be living, with HIV (2017 to 2020) to evaluate PrEP use among women participating in the Healthy Families-PrEP intervention. Quarterly study visits through 9 months included HIV and pregnancy testing and HIV prevention counseling. PrEP was provided in electronic pillboxes, providing the primary adherence measure ("high" adherence when pillbox was opened ≥80% of days). Enrollment questionnaires assessed factors associated with PrEP use. Plasma tenofovir (TFV) and intraerythrocytic TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations were determined quarterly for women who acquired HIV and a randomly selected subset of those who did not; concentrations TFV ≥40 ng/mL and TFV-DP ≥600 fmol/punch were categorized as "high." Women who became pregnant were initially exited from the cohort by design; from March 2019, women with incident pregnancy remained in the study with quarterly follow-up until pregnancy outcome. Primary outcomes included (1) PrEP uptake (proportion who initiated PrEP); and (2) PrEP adherence (proportion of days with pillbox openings during the first 3 months following PrEP initiation). We used univariable and multivariable-adjusted linear regression to evaluate baseline predictors selected based on our conceptual framework of mean adherence over 3 months. We also assessed mean monthly adherence over 9 months of follow-up and during pregnancy. We enrolled 131 women with mean age 28.7 years (95% CI: 27.8 to 29.5). Ninety-seven (74%) reported a partner with HIV and 79 (60%) reported condomless sex. Most women (N = 118; 90%) initiated PrEP. Mean electronic adherence during the 3 months following initiation was 87% (95% CI: 83%, 90%). No covariates were associated with 3-month pill-taking behavior. Concentrations of plasma TFV and TFV-DP were high among 66% and 47%, 56% and 41%, and 45% and 45% at months 3, 6, and 9, respectively. We observed 53 pregnancies among 131 women (1-year cumulative incidence 53% [95% CI: 43%, 62%]) and 1 HIV-seroconversion in a non-pregnant woman. Mean pillcap adherence for PrEP users with pregnancy follow-up (N = 17) was 98% (95% CI: 97%, 99%). Study design limitations include lack of a control group.

conclusionsWomen in Uganda with PrEP indications and planning for pregnancy chose to use PrEP. By electronic pillcap, most were able to sustain high adherence to daily oral PrEP prior to and during pregnancy. Differences in adherence measures highlight challenges with adherence assessment; serial measures of TFV-DP in whole blood suggest 41% to 47% of women took sufficient periconception PrEP to prevent HIV. These data suggest that women planning for and with pregnancy should be prioritized for PrEP implementation, particularly in settings with high fertility rates and generalized HIV epidemics. Future iterations of this work should compare the outcomes to current standard of care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03832530 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832530?term=lynn+matthews&cond=hiv&cntry=UG&draw=2&rank=1.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMedication AdherencePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTenofovirUgandaAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID36795763
PMCPMC9983833
OpenAlexW4321004198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.